In message , "David M. D
owdle" writes:
> So, as he originally asked, how do you find out what the feature MEANS?
>
> --enable-getifaddrsEnable the use of getifaddrs() [yes|no].
>
> All the documentation I could find on it for bind was a 2006 'fixed bug in
> linux with getifaddrs'. So what'
> The dynamic update vulnerability affects all BIND 9 versions, but what
> about BIND 8? Is it not affected or not tested?
As I know, there is no effect at bind 8 version.
Thanks.
_
메신저 10살 생일도 축하해 주시고,이벤트도 참여하세요~!
http://im.
At Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:53:13 +0200,
"Dangl, Thomas" wrote:
> I collect statistics data via the http interface and parse the XML file.
>
> There are some differences of the layout of the XML result between
> Bind9.5 and Bind9.6.
To be precise, there have been substantial changes in (IIRC) 9.5.1
At 03 Aug 2009 11:52:10 +0100,
Chris Thompson wrote:
> will believe this answer (and cache it). This would only be proper
> behaviour if the *.gtld-servers.net were slaving (possibly stealth slaving)
> potomacnetworks.com - which of course they aren't, but how is the poor
> recursive nameserver
I will be out of the office starting 07/31/2009 and will not return until
08/17/2009.
I will respond to your message when I return.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> Many people consider that a bad idea. the DNS is used by
> many applications
> in many manners and providing false answers can break them
> in many ways.
>
Here the primary ISP CN Telecom does do DNS hijack, though I hate this.
anybody
I will be out of the office starting 08/03/2009 and will not return until
08/04/2009.
I will respond to your message when I return.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Aug 3 2009, Danny Mayer wrote:
Chris Thompson wrote:
[...]
You are misinterpreting what I said. Of course erroneous glue needs to be
corrected. But there is no need for the servers to return IP addresses
provided for glue as an *answer* to a query, as the *.gtld-servers.net ones
do, rather
On Aug 3 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03.08.09 13:59, Ryan Qian wrote:
some isp change NXDOMAIN to a A type response, I know this is can not be
realized by bind software by default source code, so is there anyone know
how do they realize this function? change the source code or use pr
On 03.08.09 13:59, Ryan Qian wrote:
> some isp change NXDOMAIN to a A type response, I know this is can not be
> realized by bind software by default source code, so is there anyone know
> how do they realize this function? change the source code or use proxy
> software upon DNS bind?
Many people
> According to this link: https://www.isc.org/node/474
>
> The dynamic update vulnerability affects all BIND 9 versions, but what
> about BIND 8? Is it not affected or not tested?
BIND 8 is End of Life. It has several known vulnerabilities. See for
instance
https://www.isc.org/node/378
According to this link: https://www.isc.org/node/474
The dynamic update vulnerability affects all BIND 9 versions, but what
about BIND 8? Is it not affected or not tested?
As we are running BIND 8 (can't upgrade to BIND 9 due to restricted to
Windows2000), how can we test if dynamic update is
12 matches
Mail list logo
