Re: strange behaviour of resolving nameserver

2010-03-09 Thread Torsten
Am Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:44:46 +1100 schrieb Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org: In message 20100309142153.016c7...@the-damian.de, Torsten writes: Hi, I'm a bit clueless about what's happening here exactly. I have a server (9.6.1-P3) that tries resolving ws.mobilecdn.verisign.com. Queries for

Re: strange behaviour of resolving nameserver

2010-03-09 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 20100309142153.016c7...@the-damian.de, Torsten writes: Hi, I'm a bit clueless about what's happening here exactly. I have a server (9.6.1-P3) that tries resolving ws.mobilecdn.verisign.com. Queries for this host permanently fail with SERVFAIL. I've narrowed the problem down

Re: strange behaviour of resolving nameserver

2010-03-09 Thread imfel...@gmail.com
Torsten, ws.mobilecdn.verisign.com. doesn't answer for me either. It's supposed to be authoritatively hosted here: mobilecdn.verisign.com. 900 IN NS dns1-auth.m-qube.com. mobilecdn.verisign.com. 900 IN NS dns2-auth.m-qube.com. But neither of them answer an iterative

strange behaviour of resolving nameserver

2010-03-09 Thread Torsten
Hi, I'm a bit clueless about what's happening here exactly. I have a server (9.6.1-P3) that tries resolving ws.mobilecdn.verisign.com. Queries for this host permanently fail with SERVFAIL. I've narrowed the problem down to answers from c2.nstld.net dig @c2.nstld.com mobilecdn.verisign.com ;;

dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
Hello everyone, Can somebody suggest a place where from I can download dnsquery source/pkg to make it work on Solaris 10? I have it installed on a FreeBSD machine but imported to Solaris is reporting some syntax error # dnsquery www.google.com dnsquery: syntax error at line 1: `(' unexpected

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Sam Wilson
In article mailman.747.1268158060.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, ic.nssip ic.ns...@northwestel.net wrote: I find it useful to test records cache time. dig tells you that. I'll check on BIND 8 package. Thank you for pointing to a Solaris compatible source. Use dig from a recent BIND

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Chris Thompson
On Mar 9 2010, Sam Wilson wrote: In article mailman.747.1268158060.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, ic.nssip ic.ns...@northwestel.net wrote: I find it useful to test records cache time. dig tells you that. I'll check on BIND 8 package. Thank you for pointing to a Solaris compatible

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread jcarroll65
dig was added to Solaris 9. It is not native to Solaris 8 or older. Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote: On Mar 9 2010, Sam Wilson wrote: In article mailman.747.1268158060.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, ic.nssip ic.ns...@northwestel.net wrote: I find it useful to test records

Re: strange behaviour of resolving nameserver

2010-03-09 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 20100309154017.4801c...@the-damian.de, Torsten writes: Am Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:44:46 +1100 schrieb Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org: In message 20100309142153.016c7...@the-damian.de, Torsten writes: Hi, I'm a bit clueless about what's happening here exactly. I have a

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
I've got dnsquery working fine from sunfreeware.com bind-8.4.6 on x86-Solaris 10. Does anybody knows if it can be exported to another machine? I tried to binary ftp the file to another machine (same configuration), I fixed owner and permissions but will just not run there. Does it has some

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Alan Clegg
ic.nssip wrote: I've got dnsquery working fine from sunfreeware.com bind-8.4.6 on x86-Solaris 10. Does anybody knows if it can be exported to another machine? I tried to binary ftp the file to another machine (same configuration), I fixed owner and permissions but will just not run there.

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
What I'm trying to do is to find a way to get the TTL left for a cached record. I usually use dnsquery like this (12m23s and 9m53s is what interest me): # dnsquery -n 8.8.8.8 -t a ftp.funet.fi ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47912 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1,

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Alan Clegg
ic.nssip wrote: What I'm trying to do is to find a way to get the TTL left for a cached record. I usually use dnsquery like this (12m23s and 9m53s is what interest me): # dnsquery -n 8.8.8.8 -t a ftp.funet.fi ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47912 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY:

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 8be7886dd93c4870bd2a8a0d00259...@internal.corp.ds, ic.nssip writ es: What I'm trying to do is to find a way to get the TTL left for a cached record. I usually use dnsquery like this (12m23s and 9m53s is what interest me): # dnsquery -n 8.8.8.8 -t a ftp.funet.fi ;; -HEADER-

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Mark Andrews
Mark Andrews writes: In message 8be7886dd93c4870bd2a8a0d00259...@internal.corp.ds, ic.nssip wr it es: What I'm trying to do is to find a way to get the TTL left for a cached record. I usually use dnsquery like this (12m23s and 9m53s is what interest me): # dnsquery -n 8.8.8.8 -t

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
Yup! That's what I need. Thank you for all suggestion! Best Wishes! Julian ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: strange behaviour of resolving nameserver

2010-03-09 Thread Torsten
Am Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:36:54 +1100 schrieb Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org: In message 20100309154017.4801c...@the-damian.de, Torsten writes: Am Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:44:46 +1100 schrieb Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org: In message 20100309142153.016c7...@the-damian.de, Torsten writes: