In message , Tony Fi
nch writes:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Glenn English wrote:
> >
> > Just why qmail reports a T_ANY failure as a CNAME failure, I also don't
> > know.
>
> This is a bug in qmail. It tries to canonicalize domains in the SMTP
> envelope of outgoing messages. It originally did this b
On 03/20/10 17:11, michael peters wrote:
> zone "0.253.150.10.in-addr.arpa" in {
> type master;
> file "/etc/bind/10.150.253.0.rev";
> };
> zone "0.0.16.172.in-addr.arpa" in {
> type master;
> file "/etc/bind/172.16.0.0.rev";
> };
This is your probl
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:11 PM, michael peters wrote:
> Mar 20 19:07:37 catapult named[29579]: starting BIND 9.6.1-P1 -u bind
> Mar 20 19:07:37 catapult named[29579]: built with '--prefix=/usr'
> '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--sysconfdir=/etc/bi
> nd' '--localstatedir=/v
First off, please don't grab an unrelated message and reply to it when
starting a new thread. Please actually post a new message.
Doug..
I grabbed the wrong thread..
Actually double posted too.. :-/
In the process of cleaning up a much neglected PTR file
Bind: 9.6.2.1
OS: CentOS 5.4
groups wrote:
In the process of cleaning up a much neglected PTR file
Bind: 9.6.2.1
OS: CentOS 5.4
Current PTR in this format: (1 tab between entries)
$ORIGIN 58.172.in-addr.arpa.
$ORIGIN 0.58.172.in-addr.arpa.
11PTRnat-172-58-0-11.example.com.
12PTRnat-172-58-0-12
On 03/20/10 16:46, michael peters wrote:
> I've been reading documentation, searching the archives, searched Google
> for the answer, but have found nothing that solves the problem.
>
> I have an Ubuntu 9.10 system with BIND 9.6.1 installed for my internal
> DNS system.
You'll want to update to
First off, please don't grab an unrelated message and reply to it when
starting a new thread. Please actually post a new message.
> In the process of cleaning up a much neglected PTR file
>
> Bind: 9.6.2.1
> OS: CentOS 5.4
>
> Current PTR in this format: (1 tab between entries)
>
> $ORI
I've been reading documentation, searching the archives, searched Google for
the answer, but have found nothing that solves the problem.
I have an Ubuntu 9.10 system with BIND 9.6.1 installed for my internal DNS
system. External forward and reverse work fine, Internal forward works fine
but it fai
groups wrote:
> In the process of cleaning up a much neglected PTR file
>
> Bind: 9.6.2.1
> OS: CentOS 5.4
>
> Current PTR in this format: (1 tab between entries)
>
> $ORIGIN 58.172.in-addr.arpa.
> $ORIGIN 0.58.172.in-addr.arpa.
> 11PTRnat-172-58-0-11.example.com.
> 12PTR
Kevin Oberman wrote, On 03/20/2010 05:48 PM:
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:28:59 -0500
From: groups
Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
I should have been more specific.. What dnssec tools do the folks at ISC
recommend.. I am scheduled for a 5 day class in Arlington, VA in May
In the process of cleaning up a much neglected PTR file
Bind: 9.6.2.1
OS: CentOS 5.4
Current PTR in this format: (1 tab between entries)
$ORIGIN 58.172.in-addr.arpa.
$ORIGIN 0.58.172.in-addr.arpa.
11PTRnat-172-58-0-11.example.com.
12PTRnat-172-58-0-12.example.com.
...
$O
Gary Wallis wrote, On 03/20/2010 04:52 PM:
groups wrote:
I should have been more specific.. What dnssec tools do the folks at ISC
recommend.. I am scheduled for a 5 day class in Arlington, VA in
May 2010
Thx
Charles
Greetings list..
I have recently assumed responsibility and did a
complete
> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:28:59 -0500
> From: groups
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
> I should have been more specific.. What dnssec tools do the folks at ISC
> recommend.. I am scheduled for a 5 day class in Arlington, VA in May 2010
>
> Thx
> Charles
> > Greeti
Em 19/03/2010 19:43, ic.nssip escreveu:
and the results came up with a statement that "External Queries are
REJECTED" and "It would be better for it to ignore external queries."
_Question is... How can I IGNORE External Queries instead of Rejecting
them?_
firewall them !!! The better wou
groups wrote:
I should have been more specific.. What dnssec tools do the folks at ISC
recommend.. I am scheduled for a 5 day class in Arlington, VA in May 2010
Thx
Charles
Greetings list..
I have recently assumed responsibility and did a
complete rebuild of a Master DNS server running 9.6.1.
I should have been more specific.. What dnssec tools do the folks at ISC
recommend.. I am scheduled for a 5 day class in Arlington, VA in May 2010
Thx
Charles
Greetings list..
I have recently assumed responsibility and did a
complete rebuild of a Master DNS server running 9.6.1.P3. (will
upgr
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Glenn English wrote:
>
> Just why qmail reports a T_ANY failure as a CNAME failure, I also don't
> know.
This is a bug in qmail. It tries to canonicalize domains in the SMTP
envelope of outgoing messages. It originally did this by performing CNAME
queries on each domain, but t
On Mar 20, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Have you compiled qmail yourself?
Thanks, Florian, but it's fixed. The problem was that my PIX firewall's IDS
blocks T_ANY queries by default, and Yahoo's qmail does T_ANY queries. I turned
the block off in the PIX.
I'm told that qmail '
* Glenn English:
>>> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
> Both servers are Debian lenny, 'named -v' says BIND 9.5.1-P3, and
> bind's config check says it's OK. But it has nothing to do with any
> of that, I think, because the query works from inside.
Have you compiled qmail yoursel
19 matches
Mail list logo
