hi all,
i have another problem:when i use sdb mysql as a backup storing
zone data, i found this method doesn't support dynamic update message. but i
need a database backup and dynamic shema. is there any solutions?
thank you very much!
Best regards!
Sincerely,
aiHua Zhang
State Key
Hello,
Looks like NXDOMAIN can be one of the responses.
http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=DNSBL%20Usage#252
That said, I think it is working correctly (a la
name=33.229.242.205.zen.spamhaus.org type=A: Host not found, try again).
However, perhaps tweak the number of
Hey all,
I've setup bind9 to be a forwarder only. However I'm not understanding how
to confirm requests for queries are being sent through to the forwarded dns
servers. Even running in debug mode, I can see the req, but I dont see
anything in the debug msg that says its been forwarded on to any
Hi,
At the first sight it seems network problems, but when you restart bind,
the problem goes away for a while.
I suppose your dns server is resolving names for himself, try to put
your ISP's dns servers on resolv.conf, perhaps it solve the problem.
It could be a problem with your dns forwarders
Hello Folks, I got a strange issue going on..
I dig for a specific record against a ISP cache server , and the cache
server doesn't seem to see it, but When I do dig +any, then the record stays
in the cache for say 5minutes and then vanishes.
any idea?
~LA
Indeed I have setup querylog, and I have these show in my logs:
Apr 15 14:20:00 TOR-HYPER-01 named[10228]: client 172.18.4.214#47149: query:
google.ca IN A +
Apr 15 14:20:09 TOR-HYPER-01 named[10228]: client 172.18.4.214#51366: query:
yahoo.ca IN A +
Apr 15 14:23:32 TOR-HYPER-01 named[10228]:
b19...@anl.gov wrote:
I am trying to understand format error messages like this one from
BIND 9.7.0-P1:
Apr 15 15:36:02 dnsserver.it.anl.gov named[8662]:
[ID 873579 daemon.notice] DNS format error
from 209.234.234.42#53 resolving markets.nytimes.wallst.com/
for
In message t2r707abafb1004151035s6b7ee489sdcf19e662aaff...@mail.gmail.com, Li
nux Addict writes:
Hello Folks, I got a strange issue going on..
I dig for a specific record against a ISP cache server , and the cache
server doesn't seem to see it, but When I do dig +any, then the record stays
Hello,
I have tried to research my problem, but haven't found an answer from the
collected Google wisdom of the ages, unfortunately.
We have a situation where we are getting strange results from the nslookup
command (with knock-on effects to name resolution in general).
We have two primary
In message 9b2fff1719120e4c83de53c2f70cc60755d5899...@secmclust01a.corp.ssi.go
vt.nz, James Roberts-Thomson writes:
Can anyone explain what may be happening here, please?
Stub resolvers really should be talking to nameservers that offer
recursion. If it is talking to a nameserver that doesn't
In message 9b2fff1719120e4c83de53c2f70cc60755d5899...@secmclust01a.corp.ssi.go
vt.nz, James Roberts-Thomson writes:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your response; whilst I accept what your saying, I'm not convinced
it applies in this case.
As far as I can tell, recursion is enabled on the servers.
Hi Mark,
allow-recursion defaults to { localnets; localhost; };.
If the client was not on a directly connected network it
will NOT get recursion by default.
So it would seem; I had made an assumption about subnetting that apparently was
not entirely accurate. Oh well, you know what they say
12 matches
Mail list logo
