Re: "shut down: operation canceled" on zone transfer

2010-04-18 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <4bcbbd47.70...@argoinf.com>, Peter Skipworth writes: > Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <4bcbb36f.6040...@argoinf.com>, Peter Skipworth writes: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have a primary and secondary nameserver which host a number of > >> domains. Recently, the secondary has star

Re: "shut down: operation canceled" on zone transfer

2010-04-18 Thread Peter Skipworth
Mark Andrews wrote: > In message <4bcbb36f.6040...@argoinf.com>, Peter Skipworth writes: > >> Hello, >> >> I have a primary and secondary nameserver which host a number of >> domains. Recently, the secondary has started failing to sync one of the >> domains, and comes up with the following... >>

Re: "shut down: operation canceled" on zone transfer

2010-04-18 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <4bcbb36f.6040...@argoinf.com>, Peter Skipworth writes: > Hello, > > I have a primary and secondary nameserver which host a number of > domains. Recently, the secondary has started failing to sync one of the > domains, and comes up with the following... > > Apr 19 10:46:06 fw2 named[2

"shut down: operation canceled" on zone transfer

2010-04-18 Thread Peter Skipworth
Hello, I have a primary and secondary nameserver which host a number of domains. Recently, the secondary has started failing to sync one of the domains, and comes up with the following... Apr 19 10:46:06 fw2 named[24065]: transfer of 'mydomain.com.au/IN' from 203.XXX.YYY.ZZZ#53: shut down: operat

Re: Unexpected issues with "nslookup" command

2010-04-18 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , James Roberts-Thomson wrote: > However, I'm not sure why it was working when only one nameserver was > specified if the server wouldn't allow recursion in the first place. The > nameservers are supposed to be authoritative for the domains in question in > the first place, so I'm

RE: Unexpected issues with "nslookup" command

2010-04-18 Thread James Roberts-Thomson
Hi Jeff, >Did I misread your original problem? I thought you said it worked if >you had only one of the nameservers in resolv.conf. You didn't state >but I assume (that word again) that you meant if either of your >nameservers was there by itself it worked? No, you did not misread the problem;

Re: Additional records in A-Query

2010-04-18 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Fabian Hahn wrote: > To speed up queries for the user I need to force the inclusion of additional > records in a DNS response. > > I.e. when returning www.domain.com A I would like to force the inclusion > of A-records for static1.domain.com and static2.domain.com since they

Additional records in A-Query

2010-04-18 Thread Fabian Hahn
To speed up queries for the user I need to force the inclusion of additional records in a DNS response. I.e. when returning www.domain.com A I would like to force the inclusion of A-records for static1.domain.com and static2.domain.com since they will be used in the same web-page. Thanks