On 28.04.10 16:55, Chris C wrote:
> This instance is used as a caching resolver with blacklists. The
> blacklists are fed what is basically a null.zone file.
how do you implement blacklists? show me example of one blacklisted zone
configuration - not the zone file but the part of named.conf.
> I
Hi Mark,
What is the reason for rejecting non-autoritative answers?
I have other servers that are resolving this query even the answer is
non-autoritative.
Non-authoritative answer:
Name:www.cancer.ca
Address: 65.110.160.32
Thank you,
Julian
In message <7097328fe40440f2bf8419d9b6967.
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Would something like this be better? Do you need a UTC after the
> timestamp.
[...]
> ; Created: 20100429025050 (Thu Apr 29 12:50:50 2010)
Even though it's just a comment, it would be nice for it not to be
ambiguous. As a comment, the raw value isn't ver
In message , "
Paul B. Henson" writes:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > The .private timestamps are in UTC and that is what is used for key
> > management. The .key values are just comments. You should be able to
> > work out my current offset from UTC.
> >
> > % grep Created Kl
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Mark Andrews wrote:
> The .private timestamps are in UTC and that is what is used for key
> management. The .key values are just comments. You should be able to
> work out my current offset from UTC.
>
> % grep Created Kl.+005+59421.*
> Kl.+005+59421.key:; Created: T
In message , "
Paul B. Henson" writes:
>
> I've been testing dnssec-keygen and the "smart signing" mode of
> dnssec-signzone and have run into some timezone confusion; I'm not sure if
> it's expected behavior or a bug. I searched around a bit and didn't find
> anything relevant, apologies in adva
I've been testing dnssec-keygen and the "smart signing" mode of
dnssec-signzone and have run into some timezone confusion; I'm not sure if
it's expected behavior or a bug. I searched around a bit and didn't find
anything relevant, apologies in advance if I missed a FAQ.
If I create a new key leav
In message <7097328fe40440f2bf8419d9b6967...@internal.corp.ds>, "ic.nssip" writ
es:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a strange issue on a DNS server that is not able to resolve =
> www.cancer.ca [65.110.160.32].
> If somebody has an idea about what is going wrong there, I will really =
> appreciate a
Hello everyone,
I have a strange issue on a DNS server that is not able to resolve
www.cancer.ca [65.110.160.32].
If somebody has an idea about what is going wrong there, I will really
appreciate any suggestions on how to make it work.
Here is my dig and dig +trace test on that server:
U:\>dig
Hello,
Has anyone ran into something like this?
I am running the following version of Bind:
BIND 9.6.2-P1-RedHat-9.6.2-3.P1 built with
'--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' '--build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu'
'--target=x86_64-redhat-linux' '--program-prefix=' '--prefix=/usr'
'--exec-prefix=/usr' '--bin
On 4/28/2010 6:22 AM, kalpesh varyani wrote:
Hi all,
Please let me know if there is some feature in any of the
versions of BIND, by which it switches to TCP when it detects spoofed
replies. I am aware that BIND uses UDP for all its query / response
and TCP for zone transfers.
I know
max power wrote:
> i am running bind on chroot jail, every thing is working fine
> i only got one bind process ?
> multi-threaded is enabled when compile , but should i find 8 processes
> how can i be sure that bind is using 8 threads
Running Linux?
You may want to try adding a 'proc'-directory i
On most *nixes ps only shows the process and not the thread though they
may have tools to see thread information.
Linux will show you the threads as if they were processes.
>From CentOS5 (linux) man page:
To get info about threads:
ps -eLf
ps axms
___
Hello,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_%28computing%29 may help to explain what
is going on.
HTH
From: max power
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Wed, April 28, 2010 4:38:06 AM
Subject: bind multi-threaded question
Hi
i am deploying a new dns ser
Hi all,
Please let me know if there is some feature in any of the versions
of BIND, by which it switches to TCP when it detects spoofed replies. I am
aware that BIND uses UDP for all its query / response and TCP for zone
transfers.
Regards,
Kalpesh
__
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:38 PM, max power wrote:
> Hi
> i am deploying a new dns server using bind 9.7.0-p1 the latest version
> i am running bind on chroot jail, every thing is working fine
> when i use the command rndc status i got the following ,
> CPUs found: 8
> worker threads: 8
> this is r
Hi
i am deploying a new dns server using bind 9.7.0-p1 the latest version
i am running bind on chroot jail, every thing is working fine
when i use the command rndc status i got the following ,
CPUs found: 8
worker threads: 8
this is right info , however when i try to ps aux | grep named
i only go
17 matches
Mail list logo
