On 17.05.10 13:38, Techi wrote:
> I have a problem in my recursive DNS servers (Bind 9, on RHEL 5). Intalled
> package on my system is the latest bind-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 from Red Hat. My
> problem is that sometimes, queries are failed with timeouts and that the one
> of my 2 DNS servers (the one
No! Log files are indicating any issue! The only indication I have about the
problem, is the lack if queries in the log files. No timeouts, no failures. I
even tried to query a fake domain. The result was a normal record (with A+).
I did not find any error!
So, how on earth do I log them?
On T
> No! Log files are indicating any issue! The only indication I have about the
> problem, is the lack if queries in the log files. No timeouts, no failures. I
> even tried to query a fake domain. The result was a normal record (with A+).
> I did not find any error!
> So, how on earth do I log t
Quoting sth...@nethelp.no:
No! Log files are indicating any issue! The only indication I have about the
problem, is the lack if queries in the log files. No timeouts, no
failures. I
even tried to query a fake domain. The result was a normal record (with A+).
I did not find any error!
So, how
Hello,
I wanted to ask if using TXT fields can have some bad implication
security issues
thanks
Rick
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On May 18 2010, fddi wrote:
I wanted to ask if using TXT fields can have some bad implication
security issues
It rather depends what you put in them, doesn't it?
hostname TXT "Root password is AndyPandy"
mc-room TXT "Entacode is 2038"
...
--
Chris Thompson
Email: c...@cam.ac.uk
>The DNS Servers are authoritive. I have more than 100 users for them,
and the
>number of queries performed per minute is very high due to the nature
of our
>organization. Moreover, I do not have a specific time window in which
the
>timeouts occur, so, it is impossible to run it 24/7! From your
Are all the slaves authoritative for all the zones? If so, unless
you're using forwarding, or some really odd delegation, queries
shouldn't be going to the master servers.
Todd.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+tsnyder=rim@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+tsnyder=r
Any help for me? :,-(
2010/5/17 Alessandro:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install the last version of Bind in a standalone Windows
> 2003 Server.
>
> I would set a caching-only nameserver, but I'm not so expert.
>
> I would:
> - limit who can use this nameserver
> - log the failed queries
> - delete the
Any help for me? :,-(
2010/5/17 Alessandro:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install the last version of Bind in a standalone Windows
> 2003 Server.
>
> I would set a caching-only nameserver, but I'm not so expert.
>
> I would:
> - limit who can use this nameserver
> - log the failed queries
> - delete the
Alessandro,
Generally people won't want to lay out entire configurations for you. Spend a
little time with the DNS & BIND book which will be your loving companion as a
BIND admin (available on google books for free if your google-fu is good), and
come back with direct questions/configuration e
Could anyone offer an explanation for what condition(s) trigger this
error in older, out of date versions of BIND, specifically, BIND
9.5.1b1 ?
resolver.c:5617: REQUIREquery) != ((void *)0)) && (((const
isc__magic_t *)(query))->magic == ((('Q') << 24 | ('!') << 16 | ('!')
<< 8 | ('!')) fai
At Tue, 18 May 2010 12:07:12 -0600,
Keith Christian wrote:
> Could anyone offer an explanation for what condition(s) trigger this
> error in older, out of date versions of BIND, specifically, BIND
> 9.5.1b1 ?
>
> resolver.c:5617: REQUIREquery) != ((void *)0)) && (((const
> isc__magic_t *)(qu
On 05/18/10 06:16, Chris Thompson wrote:
On May 18 2010, fddi wrote:
I wanted to ask if using TXT fields can have some bad implication
security issues
It rather depends what you put in them, doesn't it?
hostname TXT "Root password is AndyPandy"
mc-room TXT "Entacode is 2038"
Post-Its are
14 matches
Mail list logo
