Hi!
I've tried to search the archive for for this, but could not find anything
relevant.
We currently run a server with an authoritative set for domains. We want to
use the same server as a cache-only DNS for other customers as well on a
secondary IP.
Is it possible to achieve this in a single
On 17/06/10 13:35, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 17/06/10 12:39, Jørn Skjerven wrote:
Hi!
I've tried to search the archive for for this, but could not find
anything relevant.
We currently run a server with an authoritative set for domains. We want
to use the same server as a cache-only DNS for other
On 17/06/10 12:39, Jørn Skjerven wrote:
Hi!
I've tried to search the archive for for this, but could not find
anything relevant.
We currently run a server with an authoritative set for domains. We want
to use the same server as a cache-only DNS for other customers as well
on a secondary IP.
Am Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:35:38 +0100
schrieb Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk:
On 17/06/10 12:39, Jørn Skjerven wrote:
Hi!
I've tried to search the archive for for this, but could not find
anything relevant.
We currently run a server with an authoritative set for domains. We
want
On 06/17/10 08:36, Torsten wrote:
Am Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:35:38 +0100
schrieb Phil Mayersp.may...@imperial.ac.uk:
On 17/06/10 12:39, Jørn Skjerven wrote:
Is it possible to achieve this in a single named.conf, or is it
recommended to run two instances of bind, each with a different
No but you set notify-source and transfer-source to the IP of the NIC that you
want to handle the view. That effectively restricts the traffic for that view
to the specific NIC. (Note this is the NIC's internal IP not any NAT ip you
might have redirected to that internal IP.)
-Original
Am Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:43:32 -0500
schrieb Peter Laws pl...@ou.edu:
On 06/17/10 08:36, Torsten wrote:
Am Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:35:38 +0100
schrieb Phil Mayersp.may...@imperial.ac.uk:
On 17/06/10 12:39, Jørn Skjerven wrote:
Is it possible to achieve this in a single named.conf, or is it
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Torsten wrote:
Am Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:35:38 +0100
schrieb Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk:
On 17/06/10 12:39, Jørn Skjerven wrote:
Hi!
I've tried to search the archive for for this, but could not find
anything relevant.
We currently run a server with an
I'm running BIND 9.6.1-P1 in a Solaris 10 server. There is a total of 32G of
physical memory and at any given time about 20G is free. However, named keeps
on throwing out of memory errors. When these error occurs in syslog, although
named is still running it goes in a hung state.
I noticed
On 6/17/2010 11:50 AM, Prabhat Rana wrote:
I'm running BIND 9.6.1-P1 in a Solaris 10 server. There is a total of 32G of physical
memory and at any given time about 20G is free. However, named keeps on throwing
out of memory errors. When these error occurs in syslog, although named is
still
On 06/17/10 16:50, Prabhat Rana wrote:
I'm running BIND 9.6.1-P1 in a Solaris 10 server. There is a total of 32G of physical
memory and at any given time about 20G is free. However, named keeps on throwing
out of memory errors. When these error occurs in syslog, although named is
still
I'm using 9.7.0-P2 to test with dynamic updates via nsupdate along with
setting up dnssec. So far my tests are working well with dynamic updates
and validation of the dnssec records, but I have a question on how the
TTL is set for the NSEC and RRSIG NSEC records.
As a test, when I do the
12 matches
Mail list logo
