On 21.11.10 21:57, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I was wondering if it's possible to return a catchall A record for
domains which bind can't resolve?
not without patches (I don't know about any).
I'm able to configure a catchall bind configuration where bind would
return the same A record
Casey Deccio casey at deccio.net writes:
After a review of NSEC3 showed that this particular behavior is
expected because org has been signed using NSEC3 with the opt-out bit
set.
I'm afraid I'm getting a bit lost due to my real lack of understanding of the
details of DNSSEC. I wish I had
On 11/22/2010 01:01 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 22/11/10 5:05 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 11/21/2010 21:58, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 22/11/10 7:12 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, CT wrote:
- BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
Really old, definitely needs upgrading.
That just
Dear Folks,
It's easy enough to flush an A or PTR record with rndc flushname
name. But how do you flush a TXT or SPF record? (I don't want to
flush the whole zone).
--
Nick Urbanik http://nicku.org ni...@nicku.org
GPG: 7FFA CDC7 5A77 0558 DC7A 790A 16DF EC5B BB9D 2C24 ID:
On 23/11/10 06:55 +1100, Nick Urbanik wrote:
Dear Folks,
It's easy enough to flush an A or PTR record with rndc flushname
name. But how do you flush a TXT or SPF record? (I don't want to
flush the whole zone).
Simple! Just rndc flushname domainname works.
--
Nick Urbanik
On Nov 22 2010, Nick Urbanik wrote:
Dear Folks,
It's easy enough to flush an A or PTR record with rndc flushname
name. But how do you flush a TXT or SPF record?
Exactly the same way.
(I don't want to flush the whole zone).
There isn't any flush whole zone function in BIND. rndc flush
Hello,
We are running bind-9.7.2-P2 with dnssec-validation enabled for our
internal nameservers, and our internal nameservers crashed at the time of
reload around 2-4pm EST, one the nameserver with dnssec debug log enabled
shows tons of 'deadlock error' for some of the sub-domains under .fr,
On 11/21/2010 3:57 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I was wondering if it's possible to return a catchall A record for
domains which bind can't resolve?
I'm able to configure a catchall bind configuration where bind would
return the same A record for all queries; but I'd rather it returns it
On 11/22/2010 13:57, Jack Tavares wrote:
And the answer to that is, apparently, no.
I don't speak for ISC so you should not take my statement(s) as relevant
to the future of what may or may not happen with libbind.
Meanwhile, is your question based on idle curiosity, or is there some
Hello,
can I set @ to a cname type? like:
@ IN CNAME www.example.com.
Thanks.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
10 matches
Mail list logo
