Dnia 2011-01-14 03:11 fakessh @ napisał(a):
>hello bind network and hello dnssec network admin.
>
>
>thank you for answered,
>I think I found a solution to my problem.
>$INCLUDE directive is that I have to handle
>
>
>example:
> $INCLUDE /var/named/keys/dsset-fakessh.eu. fakessh.eu
YOU
2011/1/13 Alan Clegg :
> On 1/13/2011 11:08 AM, Peter Andreev wrote:
>
>> I've executed
>> rndc addzone test.test '{ type master; file "/etc/namedb/master/test.1"; };'
>>
>> and have got the file /etc/namedb/3bf305731dd26307.nzf:
>> zone test.test { type master; file "/etc/namedb/master/test.1"; };
...
> DNSKEY goes to fakessh.eu
> DS goes to .eu, and I don't have any idea if registrars already permit
it
The .eu zone will accept the DS information (that is : registrar should
inform us of the ksk or ksk's (plural))
Our system performs extra checks on DNSSEC information,
trying to make sure t
On 14/01/11 9:57 AM, "Peter Andreev" wrote:
> 2011/1/13 Alan Clegg :
>> On 1/13/2011 11:08 AM, Peter Andreev wrote:
>>
>>> I've executed
>>> rndc addzone test.test '{ type master; file "/etc/namedb/master/test.1"; };'
>>>
>>> and have got the file /etc/namedb/3bf305731dd26307.nzf:
>>> zone t
2011/1/14 Kalman Feher :
>
>
>
> On 14/01/11 9:57 AM, "Peter Andreev" wrote:
>
>> 2011/1/13 Alan Clegg :
>>> On 1/13/2011 11:08 AM, Peter Andreev wrote:
>>>
I've executed
rndc addzone test.test '{ type master; file "/etc/namedb/master/test.1";
};'
and have got the file /e
I just read the release notes from Bind 9.7.2-P3 and noticed that behind every
short description of a change there is a number beginning with RT.
I hope this is some kind of ticket number were more detailed information about
this change could be found?
My question:
Were do I find these tickets?
On 14/01/11 12:51 PM, "Peter Andreev" wrote:
> 2011/1/14 Kalman Feher :
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14/01/11 9:57 AM, "Peter Andreev" wrote:
>>
>>> 2011/1/13 Alan Clegg :
On 1/13/2011 11:08 AM, Peter Andreev wrote:
> I've executed
> rndc addzone test.test '{ type master; file "/etc/
> You haven't understood. I have several includes within one default
> view and I need to add zones to them. Different zones to different
> includes. For me name of view doesn't matter.
The zones added using "addzone" and removable using "delzone" aren't
going to show up in your include files.
T
On 14/01/11 1:26 PM, "Tom Schmitt" wrote:
> I just read the release notes from Bind 9.7.2-P3 and noticed that behind every
> short description of a change there is a number beginning with RT.
> I hope this is some kind of ticket number were more detailed information about
> this change could be
Now I see, I really was mistaken about addzone. Kalman, Alan, thank
you very much for explanation.
I think, I won't break working things and continue with includes and scripts :)
2011/1/14 Alan Clegg :
>
>> You haven't understood. I have several includes within one default
>> view and I need to ad
> I recall there being a statement on the website somewhere that the
> information is not made public. I hope I'm wrong on this.
You're not wrong. People who submit bug reports sometimes include
confidential information, so we'e kept the bug database for BIND 9
closed. This may change in the fut
Hello,
My bind servers are hosting with many zones, and many views.
Due to the complication, I won't run the master/slave with TSIG keys for
replication.
I want to run nsupdate to all servers separately for the records update.
Is this a good idea? Thanks
Regards.
_
p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
>
> Hello,
> My bind servers are hosting with many zones, and many views.
> Due to the complication, I won't run the master/slave with TSIG keys
> for replication.
> I want to run nsupdate to all servers separately for the records update.
> Is this a good idea? Thanks
>
On 1/14/2011 4:06 PM, Timothe Litt wrote:
>>> You can use the 'named-checkconf -p' to create a fully "expanded"
>>> version of the running configuration file as needed for bug reports, etc.
>
> ?? Including zones added by "addzone"? How does checkconf find them?
Well, it _should_ find them the s
Hello gurus,
my rndc related commands in bind master with multi-views run fail,but in
slave it's running correctly.
# rndc status
rndc: connection to remote host closed
This may indicate that
* the remote server is using an older version of the command protocol,
* this host is not authorize
And, the named version is:
# named -v
BIND 9.6.1-P2
I'm pretty sure the secret in both named.conf and rndc.conf are the same.
Thanks.
p...@mail.nsbeta.info writes:
Hello gurus,
my rndc related commands in bind master with multi-views run fail,but in
slave it's running correctly.
RNDC is only allowed from localhost, so the only place these would work
would be from a command shell on the server that is the master. You did
not specify where you were running rndc.
I run it on master.
Here is the -V output:
# rndc -V status
create memory context
create socket manage
RNDC is only allowed from localhost, so the only place these would work
would be from a command shell on the server that is the master. You did
not specify where you were running rndc.
Hello,
I'm running it in master.
Here is the -V output:
# rndc -V status
create memory context
create
run queryperf on the same server and got a not bad number at around 60,000 qps,
however, the cpu and memory are far from used up, what else could be the
limiting factors for getting higher qps numbers?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@list
ju wusuo writes:
run queryperf on the same server and got a not bad number at around 60,000 qps,
however, the cpu and memory are far from used up, what else could be the
limiting factors for getting higher qps numbers?
rebuild bind and enable the threads?
__
I don't know what's the problem.
Just copied the config files to another host and run bind master on it,
everything works fine, including the zone transfer for multi-views.
Thanks.
p...@mail.nsbeta.info writes:
And, the named version is:
# named -v
BIND 9.6.1-P2
I'm pretty sure t
21 matches
Mail list logo
