In message <201106281853.55303.ste...@routotelecom.com>, Stefan Certic writes:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Does anyone have a sample grammar for pharsing named.conf into a data
> structure? Perl or PHP are preffered, but anything would be fine just to get a
> clear picture about grammar and logical blocks.
>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/28/2011 12:30 PM, David Sparro wrote:
>> On 6/28/2011 11:15 AM, iharrathi@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I'm testing the same version of bind 9.4-ESV-R4-P1 on two ser
there is a perl module out there that may help:
http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/htdocs/BIND-Config-Parser/BIND/Config/Parser.html
I don't know - I'm not much of a perl monkey (or any of one, really), but I may
work for what you'd like.
t.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+tsnyder=ri
I am more looking for a solution to read data with perl and convert to some
native data structure, like hash reference, or multidimenzional array, so i
can access and change data in form of: $named_conf_file->{view1}-{zoneblah} =
'somedata' and then dump it back into original format.
Regards,
On 06/28/2011 05:53 PM, Stefan Certic wrote:
Hi Guys,
Does anyone have a sample grammar for pharsing named.conf into a data
structure? Perl or PHP are preffered, but anything would be fine just to
get a
clear picture about grammar and logical blocks.
I send mine through named-checkconf to p
On 06/28/2011 05:53 PM, Stefan Certic wrote:
Hi Guys,
Does anyone have a sample grammar for pharsing named.conf into a data
structure? Perl or PHP are preffered, but anything would be fine just to get a
clear picture about grammar and logical blocks.
The only think I ever wrote was a quick pyt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/28/2011 12:30 PM, David Sparro wrote:
> On 6/28/2011 11:15 AM, iharrathi@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm testing the same version of bind 9.4-ESV-R4-P1 on two server, one is
>> a 32 bit (on which i have a redhat 32 bit) and the se
Hi Guys,
Does anyone have a sample grammar for pharsing named.conf into a data
structure? Perl or PHP are preffered, but anything would be fine just to get a
clear picture about grammar and logical blocks.
Thanks!
--
Stefan Certic
RoutoMessaging
48 Charlotte Street
London, W1T 2NS
United Kin
iharrathi@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
> Is it normal that bind when compiled and installed on a 32 bit server have
> better performance than bind when compiled and installed on a 64 bit
> server.
> the only différence between the two server is 64 bit vs 32 bit ( same RAM,
> same Disk, same NIC,.
On 6/28/2011 11:15 AM, iharrathi@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm testing the same version of bind 9.4-ESV-R4-P1 on two server, one is
a 32 bit (on which i have a redhat 32 bit) and the second a 64 bit
server on which i have a redhat 64 bit.
on the 32 bit i reach 7 qps but on the 64
Hi all,
I'm testing the same version of bind 9.4-ESV-R4-P1 on two server, one is a 32
bit (on which i have a redhat 32 bit) and the second a 64 bit server on which
i have a redhat 64 bit.
on the 32 bit i reach 7 qps but on the 64 bit i only reach 5 qps
(using resperf) and also with tcp
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Cathy Almond wrote:
BIND does take notice of this and it's something we're looking at to
make better in future releases. But at the moment it's not foolproof
and its effectiveness is dependent on circumstances.
There is short term caching of learned 'we don't support EDNS'
On 27/06/11 16:39, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>>> 1 Is this problem happening because EDNS failure is not remembered for
>>> forwarders?
>>
>> There is no realiable way to detect EDNS support in forwarders, so there
>> isn't anything to remember, really. Sa
13 matches
Mail list logo
