RE: Reason for Limited number of Root DNS Servers

Thanks a lot Mark. But I don't understand the calculation part. Is there any source available from which I can get detail information regarding the same?? Thanks and Regards, Gaurav Kansal 9910118448 -Original Message- From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org] Sent: Friday, 11 N

RE: DNS Bulk Query Tool

Hi Marco, Thanks. Dnsperf tool is not working in my machine. I don't understand why?? Is there any other tool available? Thanks and Regards, Gaurav Kansal 9910118448 -Original Message- From: Marco Bicca [mailto:marco_bi...@symantec.com] Sent: Thursday, 03 November, 2011 12:

Re: OT: Bind 9.9.0B1 Inline-Signing Question

On 11/10/2011 11:16 PM, Evan Hunt wrote: >> I know that this isn't the forum for betas > Sure it is. :) > >> We have been testing with the alphas and now with the beta. What we are >> seeing is that whenever named starts, it initially creates the signed >> static zone file, but never really finishe

Re: Subdomain Issue

On 11/09/11 15:59, trm asn wrote: Is there any thing wrong if I declare my zone like this as below... $TTL 300 @ IN SOA ns4.example.com. postmaster.example.com. ( 200806 ; Serial Number 10800 ; Refresh

Re: Subdomain Issue

On 10.11.11 23:54, trm asn wrote: ns4 named[3073]: client 116.48.39.92#61358: update 'example.com/IN ' denied [...] ns4 named[3073]: client 116.48.39.92#64924: updating zone 'example.com/IN ': update failed: 'RRset exists (value dependent)' prereq

Re: OT: Bind 9.9.0B1 Inline-Signing Question

> So the error being logged isn't really an error, it just looks like > one; we should probably see about silencing it. The error is indeed confusing, maybe it should say "not yet signed" ? 11-Nov-2011 12:32:35.838 zone inline.aa/IN/internal (unsigned): loaded serial 2 11-Nov-2011 12:32:35.838 zo

Re: Reason for Limited number of Root DNS Servers

There is more than 13 physical root servers but these servers have only 13 domain names (a-m.root-servers.net) and ip addresses. Only 13 because of limitation of single DNS message to 512 bits (RFC 1035). http://root-servers.org -- List and map of the root servers Dnia 11 listopada 2011 6:38 Gaur

Re: Reason for Limited number of Root DNS Servers

On 11/11/2011 4:30 AM, Gaurav Kansal wrote: Thanks a lot Mark. But I don't understand the calculation part. Is there any source available from which I can get detail information regarding the same?? Thanks and Regards, Gaurav Kansal 9910118448 -Original Message- From: Mark Andr

Re: OT: Bind 9.9.0B1 Inline-Signing Question

> I have just one question, what should inline-zone admin do? I assume > that named automatically regenerates & removes expired RRSIGs so is it > sufficient to put new KSK and ZSK to the key-directory when needed and > revoke older ones? Thanks for your answer in advance. Yes, it will keep RRSIGs

RE: DNS Bulk Query Tool

Hi Gaurav, Not sure, I used dnsperf just fine on a centos box. Thanks, Marco -Original Message- From: Gaurav Kansal [mailto:gaurav.kan...@nic.in] Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 1:33 AM To: Marco Bicca; bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: DNS Bulk Query Tool Hi Marco, Thanks. Dnsperf

Re: Reason for Limited number of Root DNS Servers

In message <002b01cca054$9be42920$d3ac7b60$@nic.in>, Gaurav Kansal writes: > Thanks a lot Mark. > But I don't understand the calculation part. > Is there any source available from which I can get detail information > regarding the same?? The DNS protocol is defined in RFC 1034 and RFC 1035.

RE: about the A and PTR for sending mail

> -Original Message- > From: bind-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@lists.isc.org > [mailto:bind-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark > Andrews > Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 7:06 PM > To: 风河 > Cc: bind-us...@isc.org > Subject: Re: about the A and PTR for s