* Gaurav Kansal:
As root DNS are running in anycast so number is not an issue at all. But I
don't understand where exactly is this limitation exists???
The limitation does not exist, otherwise it would not have been possible
to add IPv6 addresses to the priming response.
--
Florian Weimer
Hi, I wrote email 1 days ago (subject name: DDoS attack and difference
actions in bind 9.6 / 9.7)
But I wonder mail could not approach to your mailbox, so I request support
again.
First, Recently “isc.org ANY” DDoS Attack is frequently generated in our
DNS System (recursive Cache DNS)
Query
I am checking my DNS setup from inside using dig and I am getting
everything ok but I need a second opinion from outside of the server to
see if my ns1 and ns2 are responding ok to setup DNSSEC.
Thanks!
user:~ user1$ dig bonsi.org
; DiG 9.6-ESV-R4-P3 bonsi.org
;; global options: +cmd
;;
Here are some results using the same commands you used.
# dig bonsi.org
; DiG 9.6.1-P3 bonsi.org
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 1462
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;bonsi.org.
Zitat von Adamiec, Lawrence ladam...@kentlaw.edu:
Here are some results using the same commands you used.
# dig @63.200.45.18 ns1.bonsi.org soa
; DiG 9.6.1-P3 @63.200.45.18 ns1.bonsi.org soa
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 03:51:52AM +0900,
Euiho Kim leokim...@gmail.com wrote
a message of 215 lines which said:
In bind-9.6 installed server, response query rcvd msg size is 600~700 byte,
But bind-9.7, response rcvd msg size is 3100~3400 byte(large size), It
includes lots of DNSSEC
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:38:44PM -0800,
Eduardo Bonsi beart...@pacbell.net wrote
a message of 123 lines which said:
if my ns1 and ns2 are responding ok to setup DNSSEC.
...
user:~ user1$ dig bonsi.org
dig, by default, does not request DNSSEC data. If you want to test
with DNSSEC, add
Since my servers are getting status refused from outside, could
someone shine me a light what is wrong here? Here is a copy of my named
conf file for the master.
Thanks!
//
// Include keys file
key rndc-key {
algorithm hmac-md5;
secret yyxx-not-the-real-key-xmc/xxx/z/x==;
In article mailman.95.1321308136.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Eduardo Bonsi beart...@pacbell.net wrote:
Since my servers are getting status refused from outside, could
someone shine me a light what is wrong here? Here is a copy of my named
conf file for the master.
You have the same
Barry;
Thanks, I fixed that!
I am also not sure if that will help with the server fail or status
refused issue when checked from outside.
Eduardo
On 11/14/11 6:58 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In articlemailman.95.1321308136.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Eduardo Bonsibeart...@pacbell.net
Let's say I have two domain names, d1.com and d2.com, and I want to
synchronise all records underneath them (one-way sync, that is). So if I
create an A record www.d1.com pointing at 1.2.3.4, www.d2.com is also
automatically created, with the same value. So it's almost like a
master/slave
In article mailman.98.1321341621.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Chris Balmain bind-us...@wtf.net.au wrote:
Let's say I have two domain names, d1.com and d2.com, and I want to
synchronise all records underneath them (one-way sync, that is). So if I
create an A record www.d1.com pointing at
12 matches
Mail list logo
