Re: CNAME only zone?

In article , Ken Peng wrote: > 2011/12/11 Barry Margolin : > > > > > If CloudFlare is similar to Akamai's solution, recursive servers never > > see the CNAME record.  Instead, when the auth server receives the query > > for the A record of the apex, it performs its own query for the CNAME, > >

Re: CNAME only zone?

In message , Barry Mar golin writes: > In article , > Mark Andrews wrote: > > > In message > > > > , =?UTF-8?B?6aOO5rKz?= writes: > > > 2011/12/10 Lightner, Jeff : > > > > Is it possible to create a zone file that only contains a CNAME? > > > > > > > > > > Some nameservers can setup that, th

Re: zone updates different in different views

2011/12/11 Dan Pritts : > Hi, > > using bind 9.8.1-p1 on rhel5 i386 > > Having a problem with views.  My intended configuration: > > * most zones are identical in either view > > * a few zones are added in the internal view > > * networks in the internal view can do recursive queries (yeah, i know,

Re: CNAME only zone?

2011/12/11 Barry Margolin : > > If CloudFlare is similar to Akamai's solution, recursive servers never > see the CNAME record.  Instead, when the auth server receives the query > for the A record of the apex, it performs its own query for the CNAME, > and returns the result of this. > That hears

Re: CNAME only zone?

In article , Mark Andrews wrote: > In message > > , =?UTF-8?B?6aOO5rKz?= writes: > > 2011/12/10 Lightner, Jeff : > > > Is it possible to create a zone file that only contains a CNAME? > > > > > > > Some nameservers can setup that, though it's breaking the RFC. > > > > quote: > > Never one to

zone updates different in different views

Hi, using bind 9.8.1-p1 on rhel5 i386 Having a problem with views. My intended configuration: * most zones are identical in either view * a few zones are added in the internal view * networks in the internal view can do recursive queries (yeah, i know, i'm not supposed to mix authoritative

Re: CNAME only zone?

In message , =?UTF-8?B?6aOO5rKz?= writes: > 2011/12/10 Lightner, Jeff : > > Is it possible to create a zone file that only contains a CNAME? > > > > Some nameservers can setup that, though it's breaking the RFC. > > quote: > Never one to let a RFC stand in the way of a solution to a real > prob

Re: How to stop the traffic attack to nameserver

> >> My name servers have got many times of traffic attack. > >> When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server > >> is almost dead. > >> For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host > >> sometime. > > > > Are these your authoritative or your recursiv

Re: How to stop the traffic attack to nameserver

2011/12/10 : >> My name servers have got many times of traffic attack. >> When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server >> is almost dead. >> For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host >> sometime. > > Are these your authoritative or your recursiv

Re: How to stop the traffic attack to nameserver

> My name servers have got many times of traffic attack. > When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server > is almost dead. > For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host sometime. Are these your authoritative or your recursive name servers? These are

How to stop the traffic attack to nameserver

Hi, My name servers have got many times of traffic attack. When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server is almost dead. For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host sometime. Any idea? Thanks. Regards. _

BIND and LDAP

Hello, I'm running FreeBSD and I intend to install the lastest BIND with LDAP support; my confusion is what is the difference between BIND built with the DLZ LDAP driver and BIND built with the 'sdb' (simplified database interface) as built in the dns/bind97-sdb port? If these are two different wa

[info]: BIND DLZ dlopen() with Lua

During a bout of excessive boredom I created a Lua back-end for DLZ's dlopen() driver. If anybody is interested, I've put up a short description [1] and the source code [2]. Patches are welcome. :) -JP [1] http://jpmens.net/2011/12/01/lua-back-end-for-bind/ [2] https://github.com/jpmens/d

Re: bind as a service on windows "-c" option not working

On 09.12.2011 22:54, wbr...@e1b.org wrote: This is not the answer I am looking. If the parameter exists, it's must working. Have you tried issuing the command from a command prompt? Yes, as I wrote, from the command line the "-c" option is invoked and the bind is loading the indicated file. __