Re: ddns 'RRset exists (value dependent)' prerequisite not satisfied (NXRRSET)

Thanks for taking time to clarify those errors. Based on the explanation the errors are expected and correct. Thank you. Greg On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message > , >  Gregory Machin writes: >> Hi >> >> I'm running  DHCP Server V3.0.1 on Debian 3.2 and BIND 9.7

Re: ddns 'RRset exists (value dependent)' prerequisite not satisfied (NXRRSET)

In message , Gregory Machin writes: > Hi > > I'm running DHCP Server V3.0.1 on Debian 3.2 and BIND 9.7.1-P2 on > Ubuntu 10.10 , this is part of a staged migration , hens the old > Debian server. > > When machines request an ip from the dhcp server I see the following > in the dhcp server logs

ddns 'RRset exists (value dependent)' prerequisite not satisfied (NXRRSET)

Hi I'm running DHCP Server V3.0.1 on Debian 3.2 and BIND 9.7.1-P2 on Ubuntu 10.10 , this is part of a staged migration , hens the old Debian server. When machines request an ip from the dhcp server I see the following in the dhcp server logs : Can't update forward map nzhmlwks0091.et.endace.com

Re: Configuring a domain slave to look up subdomain hosts

In message , "Mike Bernhardt " writes: > I have a domain and a subdomain which is delegated by the > > I am trying to figure out the correct way to have the slave of a parent > domain look up hosts in a subdomain managed by others. I'm running BIND > 9.8.1-P1. The current working configuration f

RE: Configuring a domain slave to look up subdomain hosts

Original Message Subject: Configuring a domain slave to look up subdomain hosts From: "Mike Bernhardt" Date: Mon, February 27, 2012 4:50 pm To: I have a domain and a subdomain which is delegated by the I am trying to figure out

Configuring a domain slave to look up subdomain hosts

I have a domain and a subdomain which is delegated by the I am trying to figure out the correct way to have the slave of a parent domain look up hosts in a subdomain managed by others. I'm running BIND 9.8.1-P1. The current working configuration for the subdomain is this: options { direct

RE: what's wrong with the e.hushpuppies-australia.com delegation @ns.domainnetwork.se ?

Mmmm ... nevermind. Nothing wrong with the delegation. The e.hushpuppies-australia.com zone file isn't set up yet! Sorry. From: sun-g...@live.com To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: what's wrong with the e.hushpuppies-australia.com delegation @ns.domainnetwork.se ? Date: Mon, 27 Feb 20

Re: what's wrong with the e.hushpuppies-australia.com delegation @ns.domainnetwork.se ?

Hi-- On Feb 27, 2012, at 12:14 PM, M. Meadows wrote: > But > > dig e.hushpuppies-australia.com +nssearch @8.8.8.8 > > Yields no nameserver list. "+nssearch" does SOA lookups for each of the nameservers, but ns.domainnetwork.se (and so forth) only returns an SOA record for hushpuppies-austra

what's wrong with the e.hushpuppies-australia.com delegation @ns.domainnetwork.se ?

dig -t any e.hushpuppies-australia.com @ns.domainnetwork.se ; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 <<>> -t any e.hushpuppies-australia.com @ns.domainnetwork.se ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 19181 ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY:

Gandi.net now supports DNSSEC

Today registrar gandi.net opened up a DNSSEC management page to allow user management of their respective tld DS records (.com anyway).. Kudos. Dave -- David Forreste-mail drf @ maplepark.com Maple Park Development Corporation http://xen.maplepark.com St. Louis, Missouri

Re: Bind bind-9.3.6-16.P1.el5_7.1 - socket.c:4373: unexpected error

On 27 Feb 2012, at 13:18, Rafał Radecki wrote: > Feb 27 13:44:13 dns1 named[21599]: isc_socket_create: fcntl/reserved: > Too many open files It's likely that this isn't specific to BIND, but a consequence of the (combination of) load(s) on your system. Results from Googl

Re: rndc flush /recursive ?

In message <20120227134537.ga3...@nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 08:36:28AM -0500, > Bill Owens wrote > a message of 18 lines which said: > > > It's in the new 9.9.0 rndc: > > Thanks, exactly what I needed. > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:37:17AM +1100, > Mar

Re: rndc flush /recursive ?

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 08:36:28AM -0500, Bill Owens wrote a message of 18 lines which said: > It's in the new 9.9.0 rndc: Thanks, exactly what I needed. On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:37:17AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote a message of 21 lines which said: > flushtree Not in any released (much

Re: rndc flush /recursive ?

flushtree In message <20120227133231.ga3...@nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes: > With Unbound, there are two commands to clear the cache, one which > deletes only the records with the exact name and one which is > recursive (deletes everything under the name). > > With BIND, I find only the fi

Re: rndc flush /recursive ?

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > With Unbound, there are two commands to clear the cache, one which > deletes only the records with the exact name and one which is > recursive (deletes everything under the name). > > With BIND, I find only the first one, "rndc

rndc flush /recursive ?

With Unbound, there are two commands to clear the cache, one which deletes only the records with the exact name and one which is recursive (deletes everything under the name). With BIND, I find only the first one, "rndc flushname". Any command that I missed to delete recursively? _

Bind bind-9.3.6-16.P1.el5_7.1 - socket.c:4373: unexpected error

Hi all. Today we have had a problem with bind on our server. The server stopped responding queries and we had to restart the service. In logfile there was: Feb 27 13:44:13 dns1 named[21599]: isc_socket_create: fcntl/reserved: Too many open files Feb 27 13:49:18 dns1 named[21599]: socket.c:4373: u