In message , Warren Kumari wri
tes:
>
> On May 15, 2012, at 4:05 AM, Ben wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any clue to resolve this.
>
> Lets see...
>
> You posted a question on May 8th asking for some assistance. You worded your
> initial question poorly, but within 2 hours you got a complete and we
At 07:08 15-05-2012, Alexander Gurvitz wrote:
From wikipedia:
To quote RFC 1912, "A common mistake is thinking that a wildcard
Using Wikipedia to quote RFC 1912 is odd ...
Regards,
-sm
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-u
Sam Wilson wrote:
>
> Not I - another poster.
Sorry!
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty, Forth, Tyne, Dogger: Northwest 5 to 7, occasionally 4 in
Forth and Tyne. Moderate or rough, occasionally very rough in Forties and
Dogger. Showers. Good, occasionally moderate.
In article ,
Tony Finch wrote:
> Sam Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Is a name on the RHS of an RR regarded as existing enough to prevent
> > wildcard lookup?
>
> No, only RR owner names.
>
> > In this I would have expected the NS lookup to be followed by an A
> > lookup for abc.a.example.com which wou
Sam Wilson wrote:
>
> Is a name on the RHS of an RR regarded as existing enough to prevent
> wildcard lookup?
No, only RR owner names.
> In this I would have expected the NS lookup to be followed by an A
> lookup for abc.a.example.com which would match the wildcard, assuming no
> other records m
On May 15, 2012, at 4:05 AM, Ben wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any clue to resolve this.
Lets see...
You posted a question on May 8th asking for some assistance. You worded your
initial question poorly, but within 2 hours you got a complete and well written
response from Matthew (and less than 24 hours a
In article ,
Alexander Gurvitz wrote:
> You should NOT get A records. Wildcard works only for hostnames
> that have NO records of ANY type.
Excuse me while I delirk, but this is interesting. Is a name on the RHS
of an RR regarded as existing enough to prevent wildcard lookup? In
this I woul
You should NOT get A records. Wildcard works only for hostnames
that have NO records of ANY type.
>From wikipedia:
To quote RFC 1912, "A common mistake is thinking that a wildcard
MX for a zone will apply to all hosts in the zone. A wildcard MX will
apply only to names in the zone which aren't l
On 15/05/12 13:22, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On 12-05-02 09:29 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
* a firewall blocking EDNS queries.
* using a non DNSSEC enabled forwarder so you don't get signatures.
* a firewall blocking fragmented UDP and named falling back to
plain DNS.
* other packet loss causing n
On 12-05-02 09:29 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> * a firewall blocking EDNS queries.
> * using a non DNSSEC enabled forwarder so you don't get signatures.
> * a firewall blocking fragmented UDP and named falling back to
> plain DNS.
> * other packet loss causing named to fallback to plain DNS.
Gi
> rd1.ramesh40finalround.com. 98400 INA 11.11.11.11
> rd1.ramesh40finalround.com. 96400 INA 12.12.12.12
> rd1.ramesh40finalround.com. 99 IN A 13.13.13.13
> rd1.ramesh40finalround.com. 1 INA 14.14.14.14
RFC 2181, section 5.2 specifies:
"the use
Hi Ramesh,
When you query for rd1.ramesh40finalround.com. then you will get answer for
all records but it will show minimum TTL value.
-Ashok
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:00 PM, rams wrote:
> Hi ,
> I have a setup as follows:
>
> rd1.ramesh40finalround.com. 98400 INA 11.11.11.11
> rd1
Hi,
Any clue to resolve this.
BR
Ben
Hi Matthew,
Sorry for late response.I enabled statistics-channel , and it gives
web based output.What is caching hit ratio filed , i mean which option
/ filed tell us about how many queries comes from cache or...?
BR
Ben
On 08/05/2012 10:09, Ben wrote:
13 matches
Mail list logo
