Danny Horne wrote:
>
> I currently run two Bind 9.9.* nameservers (details below), I've just
> added a slave zone to the Windows one, the Linux one being the master.
> The zone transferred, however, seems to be corrupt in that when opened
> in Notepad it contains what I can only describe as gobbl
Thanks Todd,
Seeing it cleanly when doing that so I guess the zone file itself is ok
On 29 June 2012 16:24, Todd Snyder wrote:
> From your slave, if you do
>
> ** **
>
> dig @[master server] zonename AXFR
>
> ** **
>
> Do you get nice text, or garbage?
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* bind-us
On 06/29/12 10:10, Danny Horne wrote:
Hi all,
I currently run two Bind 9.9.* nameservers (details below), I've just
added a slave zone to the Windows one, the Linux one being the
master. The zone transferred, however, seems to be corrupt in that
when opened in Notepad it contains what I can
Hi all,
I currently run two Bind 9.9.* nameservers (details below), I've just added
a slave zone to the Windows one, the Linux one being the master. The zone
transferred, however, seems to be corrupt in that when opened in Notepad it
contains what I can only describe as gobbledegook. The master
The purpose behind this is not to protect the internal AD DNS from hijacking.
But rather to allow internal clients to run DNSSEC related queries without
having to reference external resolvers.
dig +dnssec somedomain
By the way, integrating BIND into AD will not be permitted. The AD staff wil
Hello JT,
I'm currently working on integrating MS DNSSEC (on Windows 2012) and
BIND here @ Men & Mice for another customer.
I might have a solution for you, but I need more detail information about
your setup. I will contact you by E-Mail on Monday (I hope that is not too
late).
-- Carsten
On 06/29/2012 07:50 AM, Srinivas Krishnan wrote:
A lot of times we get responses that look like:
FOO.BAR CNAME EXAMPLE.BAR
EXAMPLE.BAR A 1.1.1.1
BIND currently (atleast with the default settings) when it encounters
a CNAME stops processing and checks if EXAMPLE.BAR is in cache or else
sends ou
Stop spamming the list with essentially the same question.
comp.protocols.dns.bind and bind-us...@isc.org are bi-directionally
gatewayed.
And to answer your question. No there isn't a switch.
In message <92e42992-d0be-4d53-b0dc-866102a4e...@googlegroups.com>, Srinivas Kr
ishnan writes:
> A lot
Hello,
(not a Bind related question !)
Last time I looked at Microsoft documentation I remember having seen that
DNSSEC is for static files only,
*not* for "Active Directory integrated" domains !
If that is still true, I think the question about importing keys is
irrelevant .
You would
9 matches
Mail list logo
