Re: Version statement...

2012-08-17 Thread Jeff Justice
Okay, I have confirmed the correct named.conf file by simply removing it then restarting bind. It throws an error until replaced. So any other ideas why the version directive won't work? Can anyone confirm with 9.9.1-P2? Jeff On Aug 17, 2012, at 9:02 PM, Michael Hoskins (michoski) wrote:

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-17 Thread Michael Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Jeff Justice Date: Friday, August 17, 2012 6:10 PM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: Re: Version statement... >Okay, here's what I know: > >named-checkconf says there are no errors. >There is only one named process running. >When I apply my edited named.co

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-17 Thread Jeff Justice
Okay, here's what I know: named-checkconf says there are no errors. There is only one named process running. When I apply my edited named.conf, the log shows named stopping and restarting with no errors. How can I check to see the path where my named process thinks named.conf is located? Jeff

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-17 Thread Carsten Strotmann
Jeff Justice writes: Hi Jeff, > I am trying to mask our DNS servers version output to a custom string, > but it doesn't seem to be working for me. In a nutshell, I have added > this to my options block of my named.conf: > >version "[DNS Server]"; > > But when I do a query, it still shows th