Should I put a single entry for my /48 allocation or 16 /64 entries for
the nets I am currently using?
Does it make any difference for performance? Any other concerns? The
192.168 nets I use I have a /24 specified though typically I am only
using the lower /26.
In theory, no one out there c
On 02/16/2013 07:25 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have been getting this warning, and wonder why?
I have read:
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00804/0/Why-does-named-log-an-error-disabling-RFC-1918-empty-zones-when-starting-up.html
named logs the message if there are any RFC
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have been getting this warning, and wonder why?
> I have read:
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00804/0/Why-does-named-log-an-error-disabling-RFC-1918-empty-zones-when-starting-up.html
named logs the message if there are any RFC 1918 zones that ought to be
configured but
On 02/15/2013 12:30 AM, Arie Lendra. Putra wrote:
Hi,
Let me introduce myself,
My name is Arie L. Putra, I’m a data network engineer at a EVDO operator.
We are using BIND 9.3.6 ( a bit old yes), for our caching-only name
server, we are not maintaining authoritatives.
We are not monitoring our
4 matches
Mail list logo
