Chris Buxton wrote:
>
> If an authoritative server is configured to send minimal responses, will
> a stub zone get all the necessary data from that server? What I'm seeing
> is, the recursive server sends an SOA query; the response contains only
> the SOA record, and no NS or A records. The recurs
On 11.06.13 20:12, Gary Wallis wrote:
What really happens in the real world when 1 out of three
authoritative NSs are down for 30 minutes due to a datacenter outage?
completely nothing should happen.
ns1.someisp.net 12.23.34.45
ns2.someisp.net 23.34.45.56
ns3.someisp.net 34.45.56.67
All in
On Jun 12, 2013, at 5:23 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> Chris Buxton wrote:
>>
>> If an authoritative server is configured to send minimal responses, will
>> a stub zone get all the necessary data from that server? What I'm seeing
>> is, the recursive server sends an SOA query; the response contains on
On Jun 11, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Gary Wallis wrote:
> DNS experts:
>
> What really happens in the real world when 1 out of three authoritative NSs
> are down for 30 minutes due to a datacenter outage?
>
> For example, we have 3 NSs:
>
> ns1.someisp.net 12.23.34.45
> ns2.someisp.net 23.34.45.56
> n
> From: Chris Buxton
> In practice, though, your best bet is to find out why that small
> group of customers are having problems. Are they querying the
> servers directly?
Are they behind the routing problem and can get to the isolated name
server and not the other two servers?
Confidentia
I personally have been mad as hell about DNS amplification attacks,
ever since I first had the displeasure of finding myself on the business
end of one back in 2003. In recent days however I've been given reason
to be outraged about them all over again with the news that two organiza-
tions that
6 matches
Mail list logo
