We recently upgraded one of our DNS servers to RHEL 6. The other two
servers are running RHEL 5. The new system is showing much higher CPU load
than the other two (RHEL 5 machines sit around 11-15%). I am not sure if
this is related to the OS versions or something else. The build procedure
for the
Daniel, what do you see the load as? I see 4.6% CPU usage (100% possible
- 95.4% idle).
I'm not sure which versions of BIND you were using on RHEL5, but the
newer versions do tend to use more CPU usage (I'll assume due to new
features, patches, etc in the BIND code).
--Blake
- wrote the fol
-Original Message-
From: Blake Hudson
Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:03 AM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: RHEL 6 CPU load
>Daniel, what do you see the load as? I see 4.6% CPU usage (100% possible
>- 95.4% idle).
Wondering the same. Don't consider 0.00 high load. ;
>> Daniel, what do you see the load as? I see 4.6% CPU usage (100% possible
>> - 95.4% idle).
>
>
> Wondering the same. Don't consider 0.00 high load. ;-)
>
:-) I guess I need to be a little better at explaining my self. It
made perfect sense to me.
I am talking about the named process which can
- wrote the following on 11/20/2013 10:46 AM:
Daniel, what do you see the load as? I see 4.6% CPU usage (100% possible
- 95.4% idle).
Wondering the same. Don't consider 0.00 high load. ;-)
:-) I guess I need to be a little better at explaining my self. It
made perfect sense to me.
I am ta
> Depending on your OS and Bind settings, Bind may be performing IPv6/
> queries in parallel to IPv4/A queries. If IPv6 is disabled on your RHEL5
> server I suspect they may only be performing IPv4/A queries during
> recursion. You might check if this is, at least in part, responsible for the
>
On 2013-11-18 17:57, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
On 2013-11-14 17:04, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message
M>, vinny_abe...@dell.com writes:
Hi Everyone,
I recently had a recursive server running BIND 9.9.4 on FreeBSD 9.2
appear to wedge and stop responding to clients. I had a flurry of these
e
On 20.11.13 09:46, - wrote:
Daniel, what do you see the load as? I see 4.6% CPU usage (100% possible
- 95.4% idle).
Wondering the same. Don't consider 0.00 high load. ;-)
:-) I guess I need to be a little better at explaining my self. It
made perfect sense to me.
I am talking about the na
BIND9 is very well documented with the BIND9-ARM. I keep a browser
bookmark to it, and I refer to it quite often. I can always find what
I am seeking.
But, as with most things, improvement is possible. :)
Chapter 6 is the comprehensive configuration reference. What I'd like
to see is more (and
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:27:59PM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> Looking at the HTML source for the Table of Contents, it seems like
> someone had this idea before but didn't follow through. There are
> numerous links to plain-language anchors amidst mostly the
> "id25x" anchor names. (These pro
- wrote the following on 11/20/2013 12:30 PM:
Depending on your OS and Bind settings, Bind may be performing IPv6/
queries in parallel to IPv4/A queries. If IPv6 is disabled on your RHEL5
server I suspect they may only be performing IPv4/A queries during
recursion. You might check if this is
I'm looking for some help with the following configuration.
I have a request to add aliases for a server so that it can resolve in two
different subdomains.
I have a server "red" that is running some McAfee software and is used to scan
servers in multiple sub-domains.
Example: red.aa.bb.com
I'm using dig to perform health checks on DNS servers. I've recently noticed
that I'm unable to complete a full zone transfer from Windows DC when using a
version of dig 9.9.2 or newer (I haven't tried older revisions of dig 9.9.x).
Dig starts to pull the records from Microsoft Windows DC but fa
I'm using dig to perform health checks on DNS servers. I've recently
noticed that I'm unable to complete a full zone transfer from Windows
DC when using a version of dig 9.9.2 or newer (I haven't tried older
revisions of dig 9.9.x). Dig starts to pull the records from Microsoft
Windows DC but fails
A correction. There is only a single IP address for this server.
I'm looking for some help with the following configuration.
I have a request to add aliases for a server so that it can resolve in two
different subdomains.
I have a server "red" that is running some McAfee software and is used t
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:46:40PM -0500, cypher Nix wrote:
> Bind 9.9.x is able to perform zone transfers from the Windows DC
> without any issue. Performing a named-checkzone against the zone file
> with bind 9.9.4 and bind 9.9.2 returns no errors. It looks like the
> issue is just with DIG 9.9.2
16 matches
Mail list logo
