Pros/Cons for staying with 9.9 or going to 9.10

Currently running 9.9.4-P2, been trying to decide if I want to go to 9.10 or stay within 9.9.x? Since 9.9.x is ESV could stay with this version for along time, plus its more likely if we go with an applianceif its using bind, its probably more likely to be this version (have only looked at

Re: About the prefetch function within bind 9.10.

On 18/05/14 09:26, Hongyi Zhao wrote: Yes, I want to let bind/named prefetch records that are being queried regularly. In this way, I'll have a set of up-to-date cached records that I've been queried. Can the prefetch function plus caching mode of bind/named do this for me? Re-read Marks rep

Re: About the prefetch function within bind 9.10.

Yes, I want to let bind/named prefetch records that are being queried regularly. In this way, I'll have a set of up-to-date cached records that I've been queried. Can the prefetch function plus caching mode of bind/named do this for me? Regards 2014-05-18 15:49 GMT+08:00 Mark Andrews : > If

Re: About the prefetch function within bind 9.10.

If there is a query in that 9 second window then named will make a query to repopulate the cache. If there is not a query then the records will expire. You only want to prefetch records that are being queried for regularly. On 18/05/2014, at 17:18, Hongyi Zhao wrote: > What do you mean by s

Re: About the prefetch function within bind 9.10.

What do you mean by saying that "Prefetch does not cause named to ignore TTLs"? I think in my case, I have set the preftch option like this: -- prefetch 2 9; -- This will enable the prefetching for all of the entries with the TTL larger that 2 seconds, (in my case, the TT