Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-17 Thread Techs_Maru
Hi, Thanks to me to politely reply. 2014-12-17 15:16 GMT+09:00 Evan Hunt : > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 01:30:35PM +0900, Techs_Maru wrote: >> However, >> if the value of the default "7" would be the value that was created >> based on the world data ? >> ( Also for the default value of "max-recursion

Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-17 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 05:20:09PM -0500, Barry Margolin wrote: > But each CNAME is in a different domain, and their nameservers were in > yet other domains. So while resolving the CNAME chain, you also have to > perform several levels of recursion. > > Does the max-recursion-depth limit apply to

Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-17 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Evan Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:32:30AM -0500, Barry Margolin wrote: > > Didn't someone post a problem they were having a few days ago because of > > a chain of Akamai CNAMEs that exceeded the limit? > > Recursion depth is about how many layers deep you have to go to

Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-17 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:32:30AM -0500, Barry Margolin wrote: > Didn't someone post a problem they were having a few days ago because of > a chain of Akamai CNAMEs that exceeded the limit? Recursion depth is about how many layers deep you have to go to resolve an NS address. CNAME chains have

Re: Problem with resolution

2014-12-17 Thread Warren Kumari
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Baird, Josh wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone see anything strange about the two hosts? > > www.ca.greattextbookgiveaway.com > www.sorteodelibrospucmm.com.do > > My BIND 9.9.4 servers are unable to resolve these hosts, but I have older > servers that can. I noticed th

Problem with resolution

2014-12-17 Thread Baird, Josh
Hi, Does anyone see anything strange about the two hosts? www.ca.greattextbookgiveaway.com www.sorteodelibrospucmm.com.do My BIND 9.9.4 servers are unable to resolve these hosts, but I have older servers that can. I noticed that I am unable to resolve the two authoritative servers (ns1.500buc

Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-17 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Evan Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 01:30:35PM +0900, Techs_Maru wrote: > > However, > > if the value of the default "7" would be the value that was created > > based on the world data ? > > ( Also for the default value of "max-recursion-queries 50;" ) > > I haven't personal