Downgraded to BIND 9.9.6, the leak is gone, using the same named.conf,
same HW, same environment.
It is highly likely there is really a memory leak problem in Bind 9.10.
--
S pozdravem,
Daniel Ryšlink
System Administrator
Dial Telecom a. s.
Křižíkova 36a/237
186 00 Praha 3, Česká Republika
hi ,
I noticed that at peak hours, BIND response time is relatively high for some
servers.non-cached query takes over 700msI set some kernel parameters to tune
the network and sockets for redhat 6 and set some global options to tune the
BIND by modifying the cache settings, but neither I get
Hi Daniel
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 02:56:44PM +0100, Daniel Ryšlink wrote:
Downgraded to BIND 9.9.6, the leak is gone, using the same named.conf,
same HW, same environment.
It is highly likely there is really a memory leak problem in Bind
9.10.
Because many of these reports are on FreeBSD
my experimental zone (the family site) klam.ca has a KSK and a ZSK.
There appear to be time differences between the records reported by DIG
and the source records on file.
In the case of the ZSK the inactive date-time is a few hours different,
but in the ZSKs case it is 3 months.
Is this a
oops!! I swapped the ZSK and KSK in the table.
On January 26, 2015 9:09:40 PM John j...@klam.ca wrote:
my experimental zone (the family site) klam.ca has a KSK and a ZSK.
There appear to be time differences between the records reported by DIG
and the source records on file.
In the case of the
At Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:50:37 +,
Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote:
The parameter that is glaringly missing from your list is
“recursive-clients”. Do you have that set at default value (1000) or
have you bumped it up higher? Since you say that this happens at “peak
hours”, recursive-clients is
6 matches
Mail list logo
