Re: ISC DHCP does not work with BIND 9.10

2015-02-19 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:20:29 +0100, Jiri Popelka wrote: > But it's still not possible to stop them, one has to use 'kill -9'. > Any ideas ? Hmm, that's beyond my experiments. (Do you mean you cannot terminate them by SIGTERM?) Hopefully someone else has a clue. -- JINMEI, Tatuya _

caching-only name server

2015-02-19 Thread Vijay Viswanathan
Hi I understand that I need the below snip in my /etc/named.conf ---snip --- // Two corporate subnets we wish to allow queries from. acl corpnets { 192.168.4.0/24; 192.168.7.0/24; }; options { // Working directory directory "/etc/namedb"; allow-query { corpnets

Share RPZ Zones between views

2015-02-19 Thread José Alonso
Hi all ! I'm having a problem guys, I want to know if there's a way to share RPZ zones between views in a single server. Let's say that I have a view "common" and I have in there a zone called "porn" with all the domains that I want to block, then I have 2 views that matches for 2 different IP so

RHEL, Centos, Fedora rpm 9.10.1-P2

2015-02-19 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source rpms, and build instructions. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTmMrwACgkQL6j7milTFsG56gCfZBmkiO8rkThamB3mq9fpJLmk ptsAnjDyh3Ir19dwECwGw

Re: ISC DHCP does not work with BIND 9.10

2015-02-19 Thread Evan Hunt
> dhcp is only expected to work with the "generic library" (and also > disabling epoll), but this comment now seems to be obsolete as there's > no "generic" (formerly called "export") version of the library. > Assuming the issue with epoll is somehow resolved, I suspect we'd need > some run-time me

Re: ISC DHCP does not work with BIND 9.10

2015-02-19 Thread Jiri Popelka
On 02/19/2015 06:40 PM, 神明達哉 wrote: At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:17:13 +0100, Tomas Hozza wrote: We have been linking DHCP against separately built BIND in the past and everything worked for years. Only thing that changed is that we updated latest BIND 9.9 to latest 9.10. Ah, I realized I was pro

Re: ISC DHCP does not work with BIND 9.10

2015-02-19 Thread 神明達哉
At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:17:13 +0100, Tomas Hozza wrote: > We have been linking DHCP against separately built BIND in the past and > everything > worked for years. Only thing that changed is that we updated latest BIND > 9.9 to latest 9.10. Ah, I realized I was probably not clear enough about one

Re: ISC DHCP does not work with BIND 9.10

2015-02-19 Thread Tomas Hozza
Thank you for your reply. On 02/19/2015 06:01 PM, 神明達哉 wrote: > At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:26:19 +0100, > Tomas Hozza wrote: > > > There's [1] a packaging policy on Fedora, > > that packages can't be shipped with bundled libraries, > > which is a case of BIND bundled in DHCP tarball. > > We'd like to

Re: ISC DHCP does not work with BIND 9.10

2015-02-19 Thread 神明達哉
At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:26:19 +0100, Tomas Hozza wrote: > There's [1] a packaging policy on Fedora, > that packages can't be shipped with bundled libraries, > which is a case of BIND bundled in DHCP tarball. > We'd like to ship bind-9.10.2 & dhcp-4.3.2 with next Fedora release (22). > Problem is,

ISC DHCP does not work with BIND 9.10

2015-02-19 Thread Tomas Hozza
Hi all. There's [1] a packaging policy on Fedora, that packages can't be shipped with bundled libraries, which is a case of BIND bundled in DHCP tarball. We'd like to ship bind-9.10.2 & dhcp-4.3.2 with next Fedora release (22). Problem is, that dhclient/dhcpd don't play well with bind-9.10. Jiri P