Re: Caching and upper case issue with BIND 9.9.7-P3

2015-09-23 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Tony Fi nch writes: > cypher Nix wrote: > > > > Has anyone seen this behavior before ? Is this a bug ? > > See the CHANGES file: > > 4079. [func] Preserve the case of the owner name of records to > the RRset level. [RT #37442] BIND 9.9 only has

Re: Caching and upper case issue with BIND 9.9.7-P3

2015-09-23 Thread cypher Nix
On Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 12:18:37 PM UTC-4, Evan Hunt wrote: > ... that's odd, the new case compression behavior was introduced a fair > bit earlier than that; are you sure you weren't upgrading a few servers > older than 9.9.7-P2? > We've ran 9.9.4, 9.9.6, 9.9.7, and 9.9.7-P2. We never

Re: Caching and upper case issue with BIND 9.9.7-P3

2015-09-23 Thread cypher Nix
On Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 12:01:15 PM UTC-4, Tony Finch wrote: > > That's a bug in those applications. I agree that this a bug on their application code. We've asked the application owners to fix their code. ___ Please visit https://lists.is

Re: Caching and upper case issue with BIND 9.9.7-P3

2015-09-23 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 08:18:45AM -0700, cypher Nix wrote: > After upgrading BIND from BIND 9.9.7-P2 to BIND 9.9.7-P3 on about a dozen ... that's odd, the new case compression behavior was introduced a fair bit earlier than that; are you sure you weren't upgrading a few servers older than 9.9.7-P

Re: Caching and upper case issue with BIND 9.9.7-P3

2015-09-23 Thread Tony Finch
cypher Nix wrote: > > Has anyone seen this behavior before ? Is this a bug ? See the CHANGES file: 4079. [func] Preserve the case of the owner name of records to the RRset level. [RT #37442] > This caused issues for certain applications on our network that did

Re: BIND 9.10 also-notify syntax

2015-09-23 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:37:23PM +0100, greg.ra...@bt.com wrote: > Can someone please confirm if the BIND 9.10 ARM documentation is wrong? Yes, the grammar was copied incorrectly into the ARM. Thanks for pointing it out. -- Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _

Caching and upper case issue with BIND 9.9.7-P3

2015-09-23 Thread cypher Nix
After upgrading BIND from BIND 9.9.7-P2 to BIND 9.9.7-P3 on about a dozen authoritative + recursive servers, we noticed a strange caching issue on one of the servers. The server is authoritative for our main domain (let's assume example.com). There are multiple subdomains under example.com that h

BIND 9.10 also-notify syntax

2015-09-23 Thread greg.rabil
Hello BIND users, According to the BIND 9.10.3 ARM, the syntax for 'also-notify' in the options section of the named.conf file is: [ also-notify { ip_addr [port ip_port] [dscp ip_dscp] [key keyname] ; [ ip_addr [port ip_port] [dscp ip_dscp] [key keyname] ; ... ] }; However, specifying the option

Re: Options for non-recursive servers

2015-09-23 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 22.09.15 12:24, Bob McDonald wrote: for non-recursive (authoritative only) servers I have: [deleted] Note: There is actually only one interface with an inside address.. It's NATed to the outside address (query-source). Several options are defaults and specified for clarity. Does anything