In message , "Darcy Kevin
(FCA)" writes:
> I don't know about other GSLBs, but Cisco GSSes could be made to respond
> relatively sanely, with some careful configuration. We had to set up a
> "shadow" version of each GSLB-delegated subzone on
I don't know about other GSLBs, but Cisco GSSes could be made to respond
relatively sanely, with some careful configuration. We had to set up a "shadow"
version of each GSLB-delegated subzone on BIND, and the GSSes would proxy all
queries they couldn't handle themselves to/from this "shadow"
In article ,
"Darcy Kevin (FCA)" wrote:
> Really, there's no excuse, in this day and age, for a DNS-serving device --
> even a load-balancer pretending to be a nameserver -- to botch its responses
> to
To be clear, "turning off" IPv6 in named (via the -4 flag or other means),
doesn't mean named won't try to resolve any records, especially if one of
your (presumably IPv6-enabled) clients requests them. So, even with IPv6
"turned off", if there are nameservers on the Internet that -- for
4 matches
Mail list logo