>
> What are the underlying reasons for wanting to make this change?
Hi Lars,
As you know, ISC is a non-profit. Our funding comes from software support
contracts and small donations from users. We like this model because our
funding is aligned with what we see as doing our core job.
As peop
>This change will not automatically ensure that commercial vendors modifying
>BIND will support ISC, but it will at least communicate that this would be
>appropriate.
This.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscri
I disagree with this but who am I to stand in the way of the goddam
almighty dollar, you're going to do it anyway regardless of what anyone
says, this comment thing is just window dressing.
I would request that you consider doing one thing before kicking all
the BSD distributions in the teeth
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:10:16AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> I disagree with this but who am I to stand in the way of the goddam
> almighty dollar, you're going to do it anyway regardless of what anyone
> says, this comment thing is just window dressing.
>
> I would request that you consi
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:57:02PM +, P Vixie wrote:
> This is long overdue. I'm all for it. Vixie
For what it is worth, as open source fellow travellers we discussed this
earlier both with Vicky and Paul, and we are in strong agreement with this
measure to increase the sustainability of great
On 6/14/2016 10:45 AM, Evan Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:10:16AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I disagree with this but who am I to stand in the way of the goddam
almighty dollar, you're going to do it anyway regardless of what anyone
says, this comment thing is just window dressing
> If that doesn't explain it, then you are just looking to
> argue license religion and justify a choice you already made,
Or, we're just left scratching our heads wondering what the ranting is about.
Seems like there are lots on this list who practice no such religion,
and actually find this one
Hi Evan
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:45:59PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
> May I ask you to expand on why the MPL is a problem? So far the distros
> have all been supportive.
The BSD camp dislikes copyleft because copyleft prevents exactly what
we're trying to stop: the ability to ship a closed-source
(Sorry if this ends up on the list twice, did not send to "bind-users"
the first time.)
Is there any reason not to use a GPL license, which requires that
changes be shared back with the user community?
Keith
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailma
It seems some on the list are short on philosophy? Well here is
the actual philosophy and I'll apologize in advance that it won't fit
in a SMS message for those people unable to have deep thoughts more
complex than a SMS message. Hopefully you are not one of them.
You are asking about GPL but
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:38:14PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> In reality, there IS no "middle ground" If you truly believe a
> piece of software SHOULD be freely licensed, then that includes the
> idea that commercial entities can use it as they see fit.
Thank you for the explanation.
As
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:06:55PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On a personal level, I actually agree with you, and I find the idea of
> relicensing somewhat regrettable. It's not that I'm against the GPL, I
> think software creators should be able to share their work on whatever
> terms they like, b
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:06:55PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:38:14PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > In reality, there IS no "middle ground" If you truly believe a
> > piece of software SHOULD be freely licensed, then that includes the
> > idea that commercial entiti
On 6/14/2016 1:42 PM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:06:55PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:38:14PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
In reality, there IS no "middle ground" If you truly believe a
piece of software SHOULD be freely licensed, then that in
On 6/14/2016 11:47 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
Hi Evan
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:45:59PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
May I ask you to expand on why the MPL is a problem? So far the distros
have all been supportive.
The BSD camp dislikes copyleft because copyleft prevents exactly what
we're tr
On 15/06/2016 05:38, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
It seems some on the list are short on philosophy? Well here is
the actual philosophy and I'll apologize in advance that it won't fit
in a SMS message for those people unable to have deep thoughts more
complex than a SMS message. Hopefully you are
On 6/14/2016 4:28 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 15/06/2016 05:38, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
It seems some on the list are short on philosophy? Well here is
the actual philosophy and I'll apologize in advance that it won't fit
in a SMS message for those people unable to have deep thoughts more
compl
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:06:55PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:38:14PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > In reality, there IS no "middle ground" If you truly believe a
> > piece of software SHOULD be freely licensed, then that includes
> > the idea that commercial entiti
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:04:06PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> Harshith Mulky wrote:
>
> > Is it necessary for named.conf in the chroot path and /etc path
> > to be same
>
> If they aren't the same, at some point in the future you or your
> colleagues are going to get very confused about which
On 15/06/2016 10:29, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On 6/14/2016 4:28 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 15/06/2016 05:38, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
It seems some on the list are short on philosophy? Well here is
the actual philosophy and I'll apologize in advance that it won't fit
in a SMS message for those pe
20 matches
Mail list logo
