Re: ISC considering a change to the BIND open source license

2016-06-15 Thread Mathew Ian Eis
I support the license change as well, and I’d like to specifically applaud the use of a license that still allows for commercial use even while nicely asking for the re-contribution of any improvements. (speaking for myself and not the University) -Mathew Eis

Re: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-15 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Jun Xiang X Tee wrote: ... I wish to append a hard-coded text tuple into end of the section. ... I think what you want to do sounds strange, but if I wanted to do something like that I would not modify an existing perfectly good utility. I would create a new

Re: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-15 Thread Jun Xiang X Tee
Dear Kevin, Thank you for your reply! I wish to include some random information about a domain. I think your suggestion is great. I will look more on how to create an experimental record type. Do you mind to point me to an existing post about how to create it? Thanks! Regards, Jun Xiang

Re: ISC considering a change to the BIND open source license

2016-06-15 Thread Keith Christian
"The MPL license requires that anyone redistributing the code who has changed it must publish their changes ." Sounds like the MPL has the "(please?) share your changes with the other users of the software so that all may benefit" (directive?) Good, the MPL has that in common with the GPL.

RE: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-15 Thread Darcy Kevin (FCA)
That's not really consistent with the DNS standards, and will break if you have intermediate caching servers. Why? Because of this clause from RFC 2181: Unauthenticated RRs received and cached from the least trustworthy of those groupings, that is data from the additional data section, and data

Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-15 Thread Jun Xiang X Tee
Dear members, This is my first time posting a question to the mailing list. I am not sure whether I should post my technical question to this list or not. If it is not, I apologize for any inconvenience caused. When I query for "google.com", the additional section returned is: ;;

Fetches problem

2016-06-15 Thread baptiste.dupont
Hi guys, We enabled the fetch-per-zone parameter on our DNS, it doing a great job but when I check the named.stats I also see some spilled requests due to server quota while I didn't enable. As I think, if the param is not declared into the named.conf, it should not be enable, am I right ? -

Re: Enabling edns on Bind 9.9

2016-06-15 Thread Ray Bellis
On 15/06/2016 12:31, Harshith Mulky wrote: > How can I enable EDNS on the bind server? > > > Will just enabling this > > edns-udp-size size_in_bytes ; > > set the EDNS on the bind server? > > > Or is EDNS Client specfic feature? EDNS is always enabled on a BIND 9.9 server, but it's only

Enabling edns on Bind 9.9

2016-06-15 Thread Harshith Mulky
How can I enable EDNS on the bind server? Will just enabling this edns-udp-size size_in_bytes ; set the EDNS on the bind server? Or is EDNS Client specfic feature? Thanks Harshith ___ Please visit

Re: ISC considering a change to the BIND open source license

2016-06-15 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
On 6/14/2016 11:19 PM, Noel Butler wrote: On 15/06/2016 10:29, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: On 6/14/2016 4:28 PM, Noel Butler wrote: On 15/06/2016 05:38, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: It seems some on the list are short on philosophy? Well here is the actual philosophy and I'll apologize in advance

Re: ISC considering a change to the BIND open source license

2016-06-15 Thread Noel Butler
On 15/06/2016 10:29, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: On 6/14/2016 4:28 PM, Noel Butler wrote: On 15/06/2016 05:38, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: It seems some on the list are short on philosophy? Well here is the actual philosophy and I'll apologize in advance that it won't fit in a SMS message for those