Forwarding is more similar to how some other systems work. But it's not how DNS
naturally works. I think the biggest source of "forwarding = natural" is
perhaps from admins coming from other parts of IT, rather than any regional
difference. But I could be wrong.
From a technical perspective, in
True, strictly from a per-hop latency standpoint, there shouldn't be much
difference between forwarding a packet or forwarding a DNS query.
Having said that -- and I'm sure the BIND developers could elaborate further on
this -- I know that there's big difference between processing *packets*, fro
Am 12.08.2016 um 11:07 schrieb Willmann, Robert:
Hi Harald,
Do you see other downsides to forwarding?
you get the lowest TTL in the whole chain and god beware none of the multi-hop forwarders
have a cache hit so it makes it to the last in chain doing then recursion - it's a simple
"worst
Am 12.08.2016 um 07:32 schrieb Willmann, Robert:
Kevin Darcy wrote:
In any case, multi-hop forwarding is always the least-preferred option.
I wonder for which reason do you think this.
Of course, any forwarding adds a additional hop and therefore additional delay
and an additional possib
Hi Harald,
> > Do you see other downsides to forwarding?
>
> you get the lowest TTL in the whole chain and god beware none of the
> multi-hop forwarders have a cache hit so it makes it to the last in chain
> doing then recursion - it's a simple "worst case math"
Do you ever have seen a signifi
5 matches
Mail list logo
