Is there a workaround/configuration-directive not to log every request
with this "error"? One way would be using BIND 9.9.9-P2 (because this
code was added in 9.10.x...), but I would prefer 9.10.x.
Kind regards,
Tom
On 08/31/2016 03:05 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
Tom wrote:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016, at 09:46, John Levine wrote:
> >1. pick a primary domain from the list of virtual hosts (example2.com)
> >2. use the "real" host name of the server (juvat.example1.com)
> >3. the mail server name (mail.example1.com)
> >4. the dns server name (ns2.example1.com)
> >5.
Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> Hmmm, this is counter to what I've believed all along. I
> thought it was
> prudent to have key overlap during rollovers.
There are two separate things which you can overlap semi-independently:
* is the key published in the zone?
* is the key
On Monday, September 5, 2016, John Levine wrote:
> >1. pick a primary domain from the list of virtual hosts (example2.com)
> >2. use the "real" host name of the server (juvat.example1.com)
> >3. the mail server name (mail.example1.com)
> >4. the dns server name
>1. pick a primary domain from the list of virtual hosts (example2.com)
>2. use the "real" host name of the server (juvat.example1.com)
>3. the mail server name (mail.example1.com)
>4. the dns server name (ns2.example1.com)
>5. another domain from the virtual hosts list (example 3.com)
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:12:47PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. Now I'm seeing something slighly different. I have 3 NS
> > servers, ns{1-3}.domainmail.org.
> >
> > When I first asked 3 days ago I was seeing long ANY
Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote:
>
> Thanks. Now I'm seeing something slighly different. I have 3 NS
> servers, ns{1-3}.domainmail.org.
>
> When I first asked 3 days ago I was seeing long ANY repsonses on the
> master (ns1). Today I am seeing long ANY responses on
I have two remote servers, one with one IPv4 address, and one with
five IPv4 addresses. My ISP will provide reverse mapping for all if I
provide the desired rDNS record for each address.
The rDNS record for the one-address server is not a problem, but I
would appreciate opinions on the choice of
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:51:25AM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote:
> >
> > Should minimal-all (v9.11.0-rc1) work on a master? My testing shows
> > that it only works on the slave DNS servers.
>
> Works for me :-) minimal-any is
Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote:
>
> Should minimal-all (v9.11.0-rc1) work on a master? My testing shows
> that it only works on the slave DNS servers.
Works for me :-) minimal-any is implemented at the point the records are
being assembled into an answer - it still
10 matches
Mail list logo