On Friday, November 10, 2017 10:27:53 Mark Andrews wrote:
> Just slave the zones on the recursive servers. When you forward that server
> does
> all the recursion and returns the answer to you. If you do use forwarding
> for RFC 1918
> zones use “forward only;” as you really don’t want talk to
On 2017-11-07 13:09, John Levine wrote:
In article you write:
I have issues emailing to certain domains. I use my own mail
server to deliver mail. It is currently not sending through SMTP
Relay. The failure says that I have a missing PTR record. For example:
I'm amazed that it w
Am 09.11.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Oscar Ricardo Silva:
authoritative servers for all our in-addr.arpa domains and utexas.edu:
- chisos.ots.utexas.edu (128.83.185.39)
- glass.its.utexas.edu (129.116.136.5)
Some in-addr.arpa zones delegated to ns1.dept.utexas.edu on above
authoritative servers:
Just slave the zones on the recursive servers. When you forward that server
does
all the recursion and returns the answer to you. If you do use forwarding for
RFC 1918
zones use “forward only;” as you really don’t want talk to the AS112 servers.
RFC 1918 reverse support really is easy. You s
Some clarification:
authoritative servers for all our in-addr.arpa domains and utexas.edu:
- chisos.ots.utexas.edu (128.83.185.39)
- glass.its.utexas.edu (129.116.136.5)
Some in-addr.arpa zones delegated to ns1.dept.utexas.edu on above
authoritative servers:
5.16.172.in-addr.arp
We use RFC1918 networks and have our authoritative servers configured to
resolve for those networks. Some of these RFC1918 networks are delegated
to departmental name servers.
This has been running well (or apparently well) for several years but a
few weeks ago one of our authoritative name se
Hello,
I'm have a question:
IF(Ignoring RFC 1035 #do not shoot the messenger)
I need to make an authoritative server that gives 'AA' flags to every
query, I would need to set only auth-nxdomain right?
I'm running this config:
#
--
Am 09.11.2017 um 15:55 schrieb Paul Kosinski:
Exact matching needs a search algorithm too
no it don't - unless you call everything "search"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_table
On 9 Nov 2017 02:28:48 -
"John Levine" wrote:
In article you
write:
-=-=-=-=-=-
I am Munkhbaatar, a
Are you asking about the search algorithm in *DNS* (hierarchical, labelwise
exact match, with aliasing and wildcarding special cases), or the algorithm by
which *BIND* -- as one *implementation* of DNS -- accesses data in its internal
structures (modified red-black tree, IIRC)?
On 11/7/2017 3:09 PM, John Levine wrote:
In article you write:
I have issues emailing to certain domains. I use my own mail
server to deliver mail. It is currently not sending through SMTP
Relay. The failure says that I have a missing PTR record. For example:
I'm amazed that it
Paul Kosinski wrote:
> Exact matching needs a search algorithm too.
Maybe Munkhbaatar is after something like:
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch2/#queries
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode
Biscay, Fitzroy: North 4 or 5, occasionally 3 at first. Rough. Occa
Exact matching needs a search algorithm too.
If the DNS server in only authoritative for a couple of domains (and
subdomains), a simple linear search would be adequate (or even optimal,
due to its low overhead). Many DNS servers, however, are authoritative
for multiple domains, and so might need s
12 matches
Mail list logo
