> On 13 Apr 2018, at 2:22 am, Mark Boolootian wrote:
>
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I know this is the wrong list for this
> discussion, but I wanted to reply on
> general principles. I lurk on the v6ops
> list so know you think about this stuff
> a lot.
>
> > Secondly, I would look at other mechanisms
Phones are a niche market. They don’t do DNSSEC. Some of them have a CLAT to
handle IPv4 literals.
Also users are used to phones having restrictions on them which really
shouldn’t be there and don’t get addressed even if you do complain so I
wouldn’t take the lack of complaints as there are no
Matus
You are correct, I am coffee deprived. That direction was for an internal
testing only/development goal.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
>
> On 12.04.18 12:14, Andrew Latham wrote:
>>
>> As long as your zone file is correct you can use *. (Note: Asterisk an
On 12.04.18 12:14, Andrew Latham wrote:
As long as your zone file is correct you can use *. (Note: Asterisk and
Dot) to match all entries. I would put this below any other required
entries.
Example:
"""
$ORIGIN mydomain.com.
*. IN A 192.168.12.12
"""
this should complain about out of zone d
Andrew
As long as your zone file is correct you can use *. (Note: Asterisk and
Dot) to match all entries. I would put this below any other required
entries.
Example:
"""
$ORIGIN mydomain.com.
*. IN A 192.168.12.12
"""
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Hardy, Andrew
wrote:
>
> Does bind supp
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Boolootian
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 9:22 AM
To: Mark Andrews
Cc: Bind Users
Subject: Re: DNS64 & nslookup
> We've been running a DNS64/NAT64 without CLAT
> net for a while without much trouble, but with a pre
Perfect!
Thank you so much.
Yes I know http is not really relevant, but I was just kind of providing
some kind of (unnecessary) context.
Thank you again. Will try the install soon. 😊
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, 17:21 Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 12.04.18 16:11, Andrew Hardy wrote:
> >Does bi
Hi Mark,
I know this is the wrong list for this
discussion, but I wanted to reply on
general principles. I lurk on the v6ops
list so know you think about this stuff
a lot.
> Secondly, I would look at other mechanisms than DNS64/NAT64 to provide
> IPv4 as-a-service. It really has a lot of issues
On 12.04.18 16:11, Andrew Hardy wrote:
Does bind support wildcard prefix
I want to install bind DNS server on my LAN to locally test a web
application that is designed to support receiving requests on different url
domain prefixes.
Map *.mydomain.com to
For example 192.168.12.12
*.mydomain.co
I am so so sorry,
This is my final attempt to send this from the correct (subscribed) email
address. I am having problems with my email client selecting the correct
"from" address. So sorry.
...
Here's the question:
Does bind support wildcard prefix
I want to install bind DNS server on my LA
On 12.04.18 08:29, Mark Andrews wrote:
The domain system provides such a feature using the canonical name
(CNAME) RR. A CNAME RR identifies its owner name as an alias, and
specifies the corresponding canonical name in the RDATA section of the
RR. If a CNAME RR is present at a node, no other dat
Does bind support wildcard prefix
I want to install bind DNS server on my LAN to locally test a web
application that is designed to support receiving requests on different url
domain prefixes.
Map *.mydomain.com to
For example 192.168.12.12
Use
abc.mydomain.com
def.mydomain.com
www.mydomain.com
speijnik wrote:
>
> I'm currently looking for a way of making bind9 respond with a subset of an
> rrset. I'd need a way of returning a random pick of a limited number of
> records from a given rrset.
Sounds like a job for dnsdist - https://dnsdist.org/rules-actions.html
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.fin
Dear All,
I am getting the query-errors for some of the domains from my IPv6
resolver server. Server is running over Bind-9.11.3
Sample logs for www.cisco.com are as follows -
_Sample logs -_
/12-Apr-2018 16:39:22.877 query-errors: info: client @0x7fd700bba280
2001:4408:5226:163::1e2#65525 (
On 12/04/2018 15:13, Klaipedaville on Google wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I was wondering if anybody could advise please, on the line below that I
> always seem to get in my Bind 9.8.4 logs:
>
> error (unexpected RCODE SERVFAIL) resolving
> 'dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net/A/IN':174.36.198.232#53
>
> I know
Hi Ged,
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 11:25:14 PM UTC+2, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Something like this?
Thanks for your input. This would give me the desired result on the client-side
of things.
However, I am looking for a way of having bind generate a response containing
only such a subset bef
16 matches
Mail list logo
