Re: notify explicit and also-notify

OK So wondering if I have master in cloud wanted to know which port should I open for slave which is behind corporate firewall and if I set as below then my slaves will start listening on port 2034? I am bit confused on port numbers for NOTIFY messages and NOTIFY-UPDATED [i.e. AXFR/IXFR]

Re: BIND source distribution missing?

On 4 May 2018 at 12:23, Evan Hunt wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:19:43PM +, Evan Hunt wrote: > > You're right, something's broken. I see it too, and not just on chrome. > > I'll escalate. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. > > It's fixed now. > > Thanks Evan!

Re: BIND source distribution missing?

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:19:43PM +, Evan Hunt wrote: > You're right, something's broken. I see it too, and not just on chrome. > I'll escalate. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. It's fixed now. -- Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.

Re: BIND source distribution missing?

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:04:09AM -0400, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > Hi ISC! > > I'm writing to let you know there seems to be a bug on the ISC web site. > Coming from MacOS Chrome, I'm only being offered the binary Windows > distribution of BIND for download from

Re: BIND source distribution missing?

ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/ Ah yes, there they are!  Thanks. I will blame the hour and the lack of caffeine for missing that one. :) As is often the case I find the solution to something immediately *after* I post to a maillist and stare at my coffee cup ... it happens .. all the

Re: BIND source distribution missing?

On 4 May 2018 at 08:18, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > > Also, needs an update to its 'welcome' file, because > > BIND doesn't seem to be distributed from there anymore. > > I can see all the BIND downloads at: > > ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/ > > Ah yes, there they

Re: BIND source distribution missing?

On 04/05/18 08:04 AM, Matthew Pounsett wrote: Hi ISC! I'm writing to let you know there seems to be a bug on the ISC web site.  Coming from MacOS Chrome, I'm only being offered the binary Windows distribution of BIND for download from and from

Re: BIND source distribution missing?

On 04/05/2018 14:04, Matthew Pounsett wrote: Hi Matt, [snip] > Also, needs an update to its 'welcome' file, because > BIND doesn't seem to be distributed from there anymore. I can see all the BIND downloads at: ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/ and

BIND source distribution missing?

Hi ISC! I'm writing to let you know there seems to be a bug on the ISC web site. Coming from MacOS Chrome, I'm only being offered the binary Windows distribution of BIND for download from and from . Browser-detection bug

Re: notify explicit and also-notify

This gets much more involved the further downstream you go. For example, when a downstream slave (true or stealth) provides transfers to a further downstream slave (true or stealth), the notify options can get a bit messy. Bottom line is it requires some detailed analysis and probably some

Re: notify explicit and also-notify

On 04.05.18 06:21, Bob McDonald wrote: This is my understanding of how Current (ver. 9.8 and above) ISC Bind works. It may or may not apply to older versions of ISC Bind and/or DNS resolver programs from other sources. This is only MY understanding. You are welcome to disagree and point out the

Re: notify explicit and also-notify

This is my understanding of how Current (ver. 9.8 and above) ISC Bind works. It may or may not apply to older versions of ISC Bind and/or DNS resolver programs from other sources. This is only MY understanding. You are welcome to disagree and point out the folly of my understanding. There are

Re: notify explicit and also-notify

On 04/05/2018 10:02, Blason R wrote: > Ok -My question was about port number if not explicitly defined then it > sends update on port TCP/53 No. BIND sends NOTIFY messages over UDP to port 53 by default. You can change the port, but not the transport. Regards, Anand

Re: notify explicit and also-notify

Ok -My question was about port number if not explicitly defined then it sends update on port TCP/53 On Fri, May 4, 2018, 12:15 PM Dns Admin wrote: > Hi Blason, > > My understanding is that if there is no "notify no;" statement, then bind > will send notifies to all name

Re: notify explicit and also-notify

Hi Blason, My understanding is that if there is no "notify no;" statement, then bind will send notifies to all name servers for a given zone. Also notify pertains too the notification of name servers not included in zone data. Kind Regards Peter On 04/05/2018 05:51, Blason R wrote: Hi,