On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 02:06:24PM +0700, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> There is a draft and BIND 9 implementation of SHA-3 in DNSSEC:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-muks-dnsop-dnssec-sha3-01
The draft is currently expired. I'll update it before the next IETF
meeting to scale down what it prop
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:48:04PM +0600, Hasibuzzaman Gazi wrote:
> hello there,
> i am a student and currently working on a class project where i am using
> DNSSEC to secure the DNS records. i want to use RSASHA3 encryption method.
> i have haveged installed and latest bind package, the problem i
sir can you help me by showing the code to implement the RSASHA3 method in
the zone?
--
Sent from: http://bind-users-forum.2342410.n4.nabble.com/
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-us
hello there,
i am a student and currently working on a class project where i am using
DNSSEC to secure the DNS records. i want to use RSASHA3 encryption method.
i have haveged installed and latest bind package, the problem is i dont
know what is the code to use to implement the cryptography method.
If you are talking about BIND9 atomic replacement on Windows then it
does, at least when I wrote that piece of code. It very carefully makes
sure it doesn't lose the file.
Danny
On 11/12/18 6:21 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> It really depends on the platform.
>
> Windows doesn’t support atomic replac
It really depends on the platform.
Windows doesn’t support atomic replacement via rename.
On platforms where atomic replacement via rename is supported it is used.
Mark
> On 13 Nov 2018, at 6:39 am, Marcus Frenkel wrote:
>
> Thank you for the quick reply Tony!
>
> Follow-up questions just to
Thank you for the quick reply Tony!
Follow-up questions just to be sure:
1. The new zone file is renamed in the placed of the old one, only after
all changes to the new file are written?
2. Is the zone file atomically replaced during the renaming process, in a
sense that there is no window in whic
Marcus Frenkel wrote:
>
> I need to know how BIND writes to slave zone files after zone has been
> updated. Does it modify the file in place or it replaces the file with
> new one at once?
Changes are written to a journal append-only style. Every so often the
master file is rewritten to incorpora
Hello,
Question to BIND devs. I need to know how BIND writes to slave zone files
after zone has been updated. Does it modify the file in place or it
replaces the file with new one at once?
We run rsync to backup these files. Normally, if the file is being written
to, rsync will copy whatever data
Hello Roberto.
I have built something similar and used a unique TSIG key for each view. This
was required in my case as I use the key to select the View.
Dan LeBlanc
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Roberto
Carna
Sent: November-12-18 12:05 PM
To: ML BIND
Hi people, I've implemented a BIND9 service wit two views, and only one key
for TSIG.
The primary and secondary server start OK, but the transfer doesn't work
because in the bind.log from secondary server I can see "TSIG error".
Do I have to use one Key for the first view and a different Key for
On 11/12/18, Tom wrote:
> I mean the other way:
>
> My feeded RPZ blocks othercompany.com and *.othercompany.com. Therefore
> any qtype (MX, A, ...) are blocked for this domain. Is there a way
> with BIND just to whitelist the MX for othercompany.com and the
> consequent A-Record (ex. mail.oth
Sabri MJAHED (VINC) wrote:
> I want to have the same zone on multiple views, but i didn't find any solution
> that ease the use of this.
I have scripts that generate in-view configurations. In order to make
these scripts easier to write, I contributed the `named-checkconf -l`
feature which lists
Hi all,
I've been working with bind for a bit of time, but here is a new problem.
I want to have the same zone on multiple views, but i didn't find any
solution that ease the use of this.
I don't want to make 3 file of zone conf with multiple in-view statements.
Here is the server-fault post w
14 matches
Mail list logo
