DNS Query from different Subnet

2018-11-15 Thread sethologik
Hey everybody, we have three subnet ( x.x.98.0/24 ; x.x.99.0/24 ; x.x.100.0/24 ) connected to a firewall wich is connected to WAN ( so the gateway always x.x.x.254 ). We wanted switch from dnsmasq to BIND9. The BIND9 and (old) dnsmasq DNS Server is in 99.0/24 net with IP 201(BIND) and 200(dnsm

Re: DNS Query from different Subnet

2018-11-15 Thread Tony Finch
sethologik wrote: > > Is there an option in BIND9 which needs to be set when I want to get full > query answers from different subnets or something like that? Exactly, yes :-) In your options section, put allow-query { x.x.98.0/24; x.x.99.0/24;

Re: DNS Query from different Subnet

2018-11-15 Thread sethologik
But this is what i already did... could it be something with the firewall? -- Sent from: http://bind-users-forum.2342410.n4.nabble.com/ ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users maili

Re: DNS Query from different Subnet

2018-11-15 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 15.11.18 05:29, sethologik wrote: we have three subnet ( x.x.98.0/24 ; x.x.99.0/24 ; x.x.100.0/24 ) connected to a firewall wich is connected to WAN ( so the gateway always x.x.x.254 ). We wanted switch from dnsmasq to BIND9. The BIND9 and (old) dnsmasq DNS Server is in 99.0/24 net with IP 2

Re: DNS Query from different Subnet

2018-11-15 Thread Nikolai Lusan
On Thu, 2018-11-15 at 05:49 -0600, sethologik wrote: > But this is what i already did... > > could it be something with the firewall? It _could_ be many things. You need to properly troubleshoot the issue. 1) Can a host with failing DNS resolution ping the DNS server? 2) Does a tool like nmap sho

Re: conflicting subdomain delegation

2018-11-15 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Frank Liu wrote: > Thanks for confirming bind behavior matches what I saw. > I noticed other resolvers (eg: @8.8.8.8) works differently, c.b.a.com NS > host2 actually got used, not ignored as occluded data. That shouldn't be possible. The occluded data should never be given out by

error sending response: would block

2018-11-15 Thread Paul B. Henson
I recently updated a couple servers that were running OpenBSD 6.3 with bind 9.11.3 to OpenBSD 6.4 and bind 9.11.4pl2. Since then, I'm been getting a large number of "error sending response: would block" log messages: Nov 15 11:03:58 lisa named[79587]: client @0x6f2f02bc440 10.128.30.77#65198 (p64-

Re: conflicting subdomain delegation

2018-11-15 Thread Frank Liu
That's an internal setting can't be exposed. I created a public test name: test.c.b.jilapps.com Should you see A record 1.2.3.4 or 5.6.7.8? On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:25 AM Barry Margolin wrote: > In article , > Frank Liu wrote: > > > Thanks for confirming bind behavior matches what I saw. > >