Perfect.., many thanks for your hints.
Tom
On 29.01.19 16:33, Tony Finch wrote:
Tom wrote:
We're running BIND-9.12.3-P1 on our authoritative servers and we have the same
behavior with 0-ttl with a invalid soa-query. Is this bind-specific? Why does
an invalid soa-record responds with 0-ttl i
On 01/29/2019 02:41 PM, Rick Dicaire wrote:
Regardless how the change is stored, journal or zone file?
It's my understanding that dynamic update implies a journal file for the
zone. Meaning they are inseparably linked.
You can tell BIND to freeze & flush the changes from the journal to th
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 1:02 PM Grant Taylor via bind-users <
bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
> Are you referring to the catalog zone itself allowing dynamic updates?
> Or allowing dynamic updates to the zones that are listed in the catalog
> zone(s)?
>
Either...
I don't see any reason why
On 01/29/2019 09:43 AM, Rick Dicaire wrote:
Wonder if you can use ddns zones with catalog zones, haven't tried it
myself...
Are you referring to the catalog zone itself allowing dynamic updates?
Or allowing dynamic updates to the zones that are listed in the catalog
zone(s)?
Thinking about
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:56 AM @lbutlr wrote:
>
>
> > On 29 Jan 2019, at 00:25, ObNox wrote:
> >
> > On 24/01/2019 10:26, Sam Wilson wrote:
> >
> Note: I'm assuming a zone expiry of a week to a month. I think that
> would accommodate most outages.
> >>>
> >>> I thought of that too :-) A
Wonder if you can use ddns zones with catalog zones, haven't tried it
myself...
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:27 AM Grant Taylor via bind-users <
bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
> On 01/29/2019 01:19 AM, ObNox wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi ObNox,
>
> > For that to work, I need to make sure every separated
On 01/29/2019 01:19 AM, ObNox wrote:
Hi,
Hi ObNox,
For that to work, I need to make sure every separated component works as
expected when configured separately.
Ah, yes. The joys / perils of testing discrete units individually and
then start pugging them together like Legos and making sur
> On 29 Jan 2019, at 00:25, ObNox wrote:
>
> On 24/01/2019 10:26, Sam Wilson wrote:
>
Note: I'm assuming a zone expiry of a week to a month. I think that
would accommodate most outages.
>>>
>>> I thought of that too :-) A week would be far enough in my case.
>> Be careful of what
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 04:23:56PM +0100, Tom wrote:
> We're running BIND-9.12.3-P1 on our authoritative servers and we have the
> same behavior with 0-ttl with a invalid soa-query. Is this bind-specific?
> Why does an invalid soa-record responds with 0-ttl in the authority-section?
It appears to
Tom wrote:
>
> We're running BIND-9.12.3-P1 on our authoritative servers and we have the same
> behavior with 0-ttl with a invalid soa-query. Is this bind-specific? Why does
> an invalid soa-record responds with 0-ttl in the authority-section?
Funnily enough, this little obscurity came up elsewhe
Hi list
The following "invalid" soa-query responds with NXDOMAIN and with a ttl
of 0 for the SOA-Record in the authoritative section:
$ dig +norec +noquestion @ns1.yahoo.com. soa asfasdfdas.yahoo.com
; <<>> DiG 9.11.3-1ubuntu1.3-Ubuntu <<>> +norec +noquestion
@ns1.yahoo.com. soa asfasdfdas.ya
On 21 Jan 2019, at 12:32, @lbutlr wrote:
> A couple of questions
I’d like to thank everyone who helped out on this, got it all sorted, added to
the registrar, and it is all working, Now to do it for all the other domains. :)
--
The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending
Hi,
Following a previous thread (ie: "Selective forwarding?"), I've started
to work on a multi-server configuration within 3 sites consisting of a
primary at Site1 and secondaries at Site2/3. All sites will have DHCP
servers with DDNS enabled. The secondaries will forward the DDNS updates
to
13 matches
Mail list logo
