Re: writeable file '/etc/bind/db.empty' already in use

2019-06-23 Thread Mark Andrews
> On 23 Jun 2019, at 9:34 pm, igorc wrote: > > Hi all, > > I get it that in 9.10 the same file can not be referenced in multiple zones > but don't get it why is this rule broken in a file that ships with bind? Because it doesn’t. BIND doesn’t ship with any .db zones other than those used in

Re: dnssec-keymgr fails to apply policy

2019-06-23 Thread Lefteris Tsintjelis via bind-users
On 23/6/2019 20:28, Evan Hunt wrote: On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 05:01:11PM +, Evan Hunt wrote: It's a bug. I see the same result. Thanks for pointing it out, I'm looking into it. Ah, I see the problem. You overrode the default policy by using the name "default", but you didn't set a "coverage

Re: dnssec-keymgr fails to apply policy

2019-06-23 Thread Evan Hunt
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 05:01:11PM +, Evan Hunt wrote: > It's a bug. I see the same result. Thanks for pointing it out, I'm > looking into it. Ah, I see the problem. You overrode the default policy by using the name "default", but you didn't set a "coverage" value in your new defaults, so it c

Re: dnssec-keymgr fails to apply policy

2019-06-23 Thread Evan Hunt
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 03:48:21AM +0300, Lefteris Tsintjelis via bind-users wrote: > I always get this message: > > Unable to apply policy: example.com/ECDSAP256SHA256: unsupported operand > type(s) for +: 'float' and 'NoneType' > > Any ideas what this may be? It's a bug. I see the same resul

RPZ with Spamhaus

2019-06-23 Thread Mik J via bind-users
Hello, I tried to understand how to use Spamhaus as a RPZ provider but without any success. I'll use the non commercial service at least for some time because I have a few servers and one or two users, the trafic is very low. What I thought I should do first is be able to dig axfr the spamhaus

Re: writeable file '/etc/bind/db.empty' already in use

2019-06-23 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 23.06.19 06:34, igorc wrote: I get it that in 9.10 the same file can not be referenced in multiple zones it can... but don't get it why is this rule broken in a file that ships with bind? but it must not be modified in such case. Have you by any chance allowed updates or automatic signin

writeable file '/etc/bind/db.empty' already in use

2019-06-23 Thread igorc
Hi all, I get it that in 9.10 the same file can not be referenced in multiple zones but don't get it why is this rule broken in a file that ships with bind? Is it maybe left over after an upgrade from 9.9? What are we suppose to do with this file now and how do we use the rfc1918? Interestingl