Re: DNSSEC 9.14.6 error message

2019-10-09 Thread Tony Finch
Jukka Pakkanen wrote: > Having these *error* messages in the syslog when restarting the > service... guess they are not too harmfull, but why exactly is this > coming: > > zone qnet.fi/IN (signed): receive_secure_serial: unchanged This can happen in the following code, which suggests to me that

Re: Delegation not working from slave.

2019-10-09 Thread John Robson via bind-users
Yep - I know that I've almost certainly kludged it horribly... But I suspect that we're going to have to redo more of the DNS infrastructure than just this at some point fairly soon - so to some extent I'll let someone else fix it later... (I know) I had added the NS records for the subdomain to

Re: Delegation not working from slave.

2019-10-09 Thread Grant Taylor via bind-users
On 10/9/19 8:19 AM, John Robson via bind-users wrote: But I suspect that we're going to have to redo more of the DNS infrastructure than just this at some point fairly soon - so to some extent I'll let someone else fix it later... (I know) If you can, safe the poor future sole, possibly yourse

VS: DNSSEC 9.14.6 error message

2019-10-09 Thread Jukka Pakkanen
Yes I can stop and restart the "isc bind" service without problems and/or errors, only get this message in restart, if the zone serial is not updated. And everything seems to be working fine despite of that. Maybe the message is just erroneously categorized as an "error" in syslog. Jukka ---

CloudSmith repository missing

2019-10-09 Thread Matthew Pounsett
Hi! It looks like the BIND Cloudsmith repository, which was there earlier this week, is no longer present. Hit:9 https://packages.icinga.com/debian icinga-stretch InRelease > Ign:10 https://dl.cloudsmith.io/public/isc/bind/deb/debian stretch > InRelease > Err:11 https://dl.cloudsmith.io/public/is

Re: CloudSmith repository missing

2019-10-09 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi Matt, sorry for the confusion with the CloudSmith repositories. We’ve been experimenting with the different models, and we’ve decided to keep the BIND 9 packages closer to the official distributions, that means that the packages for distributions supported by us are located at following pla

Re: CloudSmith repository missing

2019-10-09 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 19:14, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi Matt, > > sorry for the confusion with the CloudSmith repositories. We’ve been > experimenting with the different models, and we’ve decided to keep the BIND > 9 packages closer to the official distributions, that means that the > packages for