On 12/30/19 7:26 PM, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
On 12/30/19 6:22 PM, N6Ghost wrote:
but generally you acquire IP space in blocks not single address's.
and those blocks are what you use to build your internal and external
reverse zone files.
Agreed.
But you wouldn't be using RFC
On 12/30/19 6:22 PM, N6Ghost wrote:
but generally you acquire IP space in blocks not single address's.
and those blocks are what you use to build your internal and external
reverse zone files.
Agreed.
But you wouldn't be using RFC 2317 Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation
because the reverse
On 12/30/19 1:13 PM, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
On 12/30/19 1:34 PM, N6Ghost wrote:
1: is the IP space delegated or not?
What is delegated IP space in this context?
Are you referring to a separate prefix that is routed to the customer?
This ref to the IP space that you OWN. In
Hi,
some additions.
on Monday, 30. December 2019, 23:48:41 CET I wrote:
> resolver1 asks Autoritative of the com-Zone for ImenT.Com or wWw.ImenT.Com
There are two ways for a resolver to behave.
The slower way which is leaking less information to the highest levels of the
authoritatives is to
On Monday, December 30, 2019 1:15:48 PM PST Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
> On 12/30/19 1:42 PM, N6Ghost wrote:
> > delegations are always by block... ie /20, /24, /25 etc
>
> I feel like there is term conflation.
>
> To me:
> · Delegations are DNS and are done on the dot boundary.
>
Hi Tony,
on Monday, 30. Dezember 2019, 20:10:57 CET Tony Finch wrote:
> It's very difficult to make the DNS properly case-preserving, because a
> parent zone and a child zone can disagree with each other about the case
> of the parent zone.
dnsext-dns0x20-00 doesn't have anything to do with
On 12/30/19 12:07 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
of course.
The idea of an ISP telling me how to configure my DNS server causes
indigestion, possibly severe.
My registrar, the parent domain owner / operator, doesn't get to tell me
how to configure my DNS server. The only thing they get
On 12/30/19 1:42 PM, N6Ghost wrote:
delegations are always by block... ie /20, /24, /25 etc
I feel like there is term conflation.
To me:
· Delegations are DNS and are done on the dot boundary.
· Routes are done on the block boundary.
The two can be related, but quite distinct.
--
On 12/30/19 1:34 PM, N6Ghost wrote:
1: is the IP space delegated or not?
What is delegated IP space in this context?
Are you referring to a separate prefix that is routed to the customer?
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Friday, December 27, 2019 12:22:55 PM PST Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 27.12.19 um 21:06 schrieb Grant Taylor via bind-users:
> >> if the ISP is willing to do and if you really own a large enough range
> >> that it makes sense is a different question, for just 3 random
> >> addresses it is
On Friday, December 27, 2019 9:49:10 AM PST Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 27.12.19 um 16:58 schrieb Grant Taylor via bind-users:
> > On 12/27/19 7:04 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> they configure it for fetching from your servers.
> >
> > I do object to this part of the statement.
> >
> >
On Monday, December 30, 2019 11:07:36 AM PST Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >>I think that it should be either change local DNS or call ISP to
> >>change it, not both at once. Having both usually creates/hides
> >>different kinds of problems.
> >
> >Yes, ideally the configuration lives in one
On Friday, December 27, 2019 10:01:31 AM PST Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 27.12.19 um 18:58 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> The only thing that I saw was a slip in that there is something
> outside the local DNS server that needs to be configured for reverse
> DNS.
> >>
> >> Am
Itay Alayoff wrote:
> I'd like to know where is the policy eviction currently implemented?
The way I answer questions like this is to start from the configuration
options, and working my way from bin/named/server.c (where the parsed
config file is processed) I trace through to find the code
Jaco,
I've been running it built that way for more than a week without apparent
problems.
--
Jeff Wieland, UNIX/Network Systems Administrator
Purdue University IT Infrastructure Services UNIX Platforms
On December 30, 2019 7:21:43 AM EST, Jaco Lesch wrote:
Jeff
Picking up a similar error when
Dns Admin wrote:
>
> ./configure -h
>
> Will give you list of the available options.
Yes, and there's a bit more information in the README
https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/blob/master/README.md#opts
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Forth, Tyne, Dogger: Northwest 4 to 6,
Fred Morris wrote:
> Regarding case, in any case (pardon the pun) case is not guaranteed.
> Especially regarding dynamic updates, your case will not be preserved
> (and maybe I fat-fingered and left caps lock on once upon a time without
> realizing it) in the authoritative zone.
Well, it's a
I think that it should be either change local DNS or call ISP to
change it, not both at once. Having both usually creates/hides
different kinds of problems.
Yes, ideally the configuration lives in one place. Multi-master is
always problematic. Particularly for day to day operations.
Lars Kollstedt wrote:
>
> for more information about this see
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20-00
>
> and
>
> https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/20/contributions/265/attachments/254/471/ISC-case-sensitivity.pdf
Yes. And one prominent resolver that implements this is
Jeff
Picking up a similar error when compiling on Solaris 11.4 with Oracle
Studio 12.6:
libtool: compile:
/opt/SunStudio/OracleDeveloperStudio12.6-solaris-sparc-bin/developerstudio12.6/bin/cc
-mt -I/usr/local/src/bind-9.11.14 -I../.. -I./unix/include
-I./pthreads/include
20 matches
Mail list logo
