Hi ?
You have delegated the domain "sub.test.local" but you have no zone
statement for this zone.
Suggest you create a db.sub.test.local zone file and update your
configuration with
zone "sub.test.local" IN {
type master;
file "db.sub.test.local";
};
Hi,
In summary, my question is whether there is a way to configure a bind caching
server to provide recursion in response to iterative queries for records in a
forward type zone.
The background is that we have:
- AD domain controllers that are authoritative for all of 10.in-addr.arpa. in
our
Thanks for the reply.
Actually my setup is just like 1) zone delegation
Am 03.04.20 um 15:20 schrieb David Alexandre M. de Carvalho:
> Where can I find about alternatives to point 2?
in the part you quoted from me
> I have a windows subdomain configured in that way, never realized there was a
On 03.04.20 14:20, David Alexandre M. de Carvalho wrote:
Where can I find about alternatives to point 2?
I have a windows subdomain configured in that way, never realized there was a
better way.
On 03.04.20 16:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
if you want to have subdomain with different set
On 03.04.20 14:20, David Alexandre M. de Carvalho wrote:
Where can I find about alternatives to point 2?
I have a windows subdomain configured in that way, never realized there was a
better way.
if you want to have subdomain with different set of nameservers, you should
put it into another
Am 03.04.20 um 15:20 schrieb David Alexandre M. de Carvalho:
> Where can I find about alternatives to point 2?
in the part you quoted from me
> I have a windows subdomain configured in that way, never realized there was a
> better way.
> Thanks and regards.
which way?
a) zone-delegation,
Hi!
Where can I find about alternatives to point 2?
I have a windows subdomain configured in that way, never realized there was a
better way.
Thanks and regards.
Os melhores cumprimentos
David Alexandre M. de Carvalho
---
Especialista de Informática
why so much complexity to begin with?
t1 A 127.0.0.3
sub.t30 A 127.0.0.2
On 03.04.20 11:53, mail-list-us...@materna.de wrote:
---
Well, in first place to make it human readable, if needed to look into the zone.
well
1. the above is more readablt than whay you
> why so much complexity to begin with?
>
>t1 A 127.0.0.3
>sub.t30 A 127.0.0.2
---
Well, in first place to make it human readable, if needed to look into the zone.
For some subdomains we would have entries for the subdomain itself, like couple
NS,TXT,A,CNAME,SRV
Am 03.04.20 um 10:51 schrieb Timothe Litt:
> The entropy problem is especially severe in many VMs. Besides Warren's
> suggestion:
>
> Many current machines have hardware random noise sources that solve (or
> at least
> put a big dent) into the entropy problem. A raspberry Pi is
> inexpensive,
The entropy problem is especially severe in many VMs. Besides Warren's
suggestion:
Many current machines have hardware random noise sources that solve (or
at least
put a big dent) into the entropy problem. A raspberry Pi is
inexpensive, and unless you
are generating zillions of keys, will solve
Am 03.04.20 um 08:19 schrieb mail-list-us...@materna.de:
> ---
>
> The zone file:
> ---
> $ORIGIN .
> $TTL 604800 ; 1 week
> test.local IN SOA mytest.test.local. root.test.local. (
> 2020040123 ; serial
>
Good morning,
we try to use in our zone files for easy including of new sub domains.
While it worked on my test system, in production we get either NXDOMAIN or
SERVFAIL,
both use bind 9.11.2 from the distro. Level 10 debug with all possible logs
enabled did gave no answer.
Maybe someone on
13 matches
Mail list logo
