On Apr 20, 2020, at 18:11, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> Really all machines should be updating their own address records in the
> DNS. Have each machine create a KEY record with its name. Install the
> KEY record in the DNS. Use SIG(0) signed UPDATE requests to update the
> address records.
This w
Really all machines should be updating their own address records in the
DNS. Have each machine create a KEY record with its name. Install the
KEY record in the DNS. Use SIG(0) signed UPDATE requests to update the
address records.
update-policy {
grant * self . A KEY; // Allow the m
On 2020-04-17 06:45, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> We have what appears to be a significant memory leak in BIND-9.16.1.
>
> Environment:
> FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE.
> BIND-9.16.1 installed from packages.
> Also uses libuv-1.35.0 installed from packages.
> Authoritative only.
> Around 800 zones of var
On 2020-04-20 10:33, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:52 PM Tony Finch wrote:
@lbutlr wrote:
>
> Is it possible to batch update all the domains? Looking at nsupdate it
> looks like I have to step through and do every domain individually.
An UPDATE request can change many recor
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:52 PM Tony Finch wrote:
>
> @lbutlr wrote:
> >
> > Is it possible to batch update all the domains? Looking at nsupdate it
> > looks like I have to step through and do every domain individually.
>
> An UPDATE request can change many records, so long as they are all in th
On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 13:06 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Note there isn’t a “additional lookup occurring” because what you are
> seeing is a referral and a answer.
Yes, I realised that after sending my email. r.au returned the webcity
nameservers, and one of those returned the NS details requested
6 matches
Mail list logo