Re: DNS_RRL_MAX_RATE defines 1000

2020-07-08 Thread Zhiyong Cheng
Thanks for this reply : ) We are using named cluster in our internal network as the authoritative DNS. So there are no cache servers between clients and named cluster. Maybe we should add one but it is just another story. There was a strange thing when I tested RRL using queryperf.  I

Re: Request for review of performance advice

2020-07-08 Thread Chuck Aurora
On 2020-07-07 20:57, Victoria Risk wrote: A while ago we created a KB article with tips on how to improve your performance with our Kea dhcp server. The tips were fairly obvious to our developers and this was pretty successful. We would like to do something similar for BIND, provide a dozen or

Re: Request for review of performance advice

2020-07-08 Thread John Thurston
On 7/7/2020 5:57 PM, Victoria Risk wrote: A while ago we created a KB article with tips on how to improve your performance with our Kea dhcp server. The tips were fairly obvious to our developers and this was pretty successful. We would like to do something similar for BIND, provide a dozen

Re: How to prepublish additional DNSKEY

2020-07-08 Thread Shumon Huque
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:33 AM Tony Finch wrote: > Klaus Darilion wrote: > > > > A signed zone shall be moved to another DNS provider. Hence I want to > > add the public KSK of the gaining DNS provider as additional DNSKEY to > > the zone. > > I guess you might already have seen this draft -

Re: DNS_RRL_MAX_RATE defines 1000

2020-07-08 Thread Tony Finch
程智勇 wrote: > > So could anybody tell me why DNS_RRL_MAX_RATE defined 1000? RRL is designed for authoritative DNS servers. Legitimate queries come from recursive resolvers with caches. There should not be more than one query for each RRset from each resolver per TTL. So a normal response rate

Re: Bind 9.16.x won't start from systemd

2020-07-08 Thread @lbutlr
On 08 Jul 2020, at 05:03, Adrian van Bloois wrote: > When I try to start bind 9.16.x from systemd it fails not being able to > find something. … > What could be the problem??? Not really possible to guess without the error message. -- "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so,

Re: How to prepublish additional DNSKEY

2020-07-08 Thread Tony Finch
Klaus Darilion wrote: > > A signed zone shall be moved to another DNS provider. Hence I want to > add the public KSK of the gaining DNS provider as additional DNSKEY to > the zone. I guess you might already have seen this draft - it discusses long-term multi-provider setups rather than

Re: Bind 9.16.x won't start from systemd

2020-07-08 Thread Ondřej Surý
Adrian, your email didn’t contain any useful information we can go by. It’s hard to debug anything by just going „fails not being able to find something“. You will have to provide the list with the logs, etc. if you want people to actually provide helpful advices. And Ged, could we please

Re: Bind 9.16.x won't start from systemd

2020-07-08 Thread G.W. Haywood via bind-users
Hi there, On Wed, 8 Jul 2020, Adrian van Bloois wrote: When I try to start bind 9.16.x from systemd it fails not being able to find something. When I start it straight from the CMD-line like: sudo /usr/local/sbin/named There is no problem and it works fine. What could be the problem???

Bind 9.16.x won't start from systemd

2020-07-08 Thread Adrian van Bloois
Hi, When I try to start bind 9.16.x from systemd it fails not being able to find something. When I start it straight from the CMD-line like: sudo /usr/local/sbin/named There is no problem and it works fine. What could be the problem??? Adrian -- Adri P. van Bloois

How to prepublish additional DNSKEY

2020-07-08 Thread Klaus Darilion
Hello all! A signed zone shall be moved to another DNS provider. Hence I want to add the public KSK of the gaining DNS provider as additional DNSKEY to the zone. My setup ist: Bind1 as hidden primary --> Bind2 as bump-in-the-wire signer -> public facing secondaries I tried to add the DNSKEY

DNS_RRL_MAX_RATE defines 1000

2020-07-08 Thread 程智勇
Hi, all I deployed a cluster of DNS which combined with a master and two slaves recently. I opened the response rate limiting function in slaves, which parameters like below: rate-limit {     ipv4-prefix-length 32;     responses-per-second 250;     all-per-second 1000;     min-table-size