Re: Invalid class in dns query

2020-08-05 Thread Mark Andrews
> On 6 Aug 2020, at 10:11, John Levine wrote: > > In article you write: >> Hi all, >> >> Looking for a temporary work around, while an issue gets resolved. I have a >> DNS query coming in with an invalid class requested (65 or 0x41). > > The only classes ever assigned were 1, 2, 3, 4, and

Re: Invalid class in dns query

2020-08-05 Thread John Levine
In article you write: >Hi all, > >Looking for a temporary work around, while an issue gets resolved. I have a >DNS query coming in with an invalid class requested (65 or 0x41). The only classes ever assigned were 1, 2, 3, 4, and pseudo-classes 254 and 255. What is class 65 supposed to be? Why

Re: Cannot get nsupdate to work (for letsencrypt acme.sh client)

2020-08-05 Thread Mark Andrews
Unfortunately comments section on that page doesn’t work. You press preview and you get a error response back. > On 6 Aug 2020, at 02:21, Brett Delmage wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Mark Andrews wrote: > >> If I use the example zone on that page *no* errors are reported. >> If I modify

Re: Cannot get nsupdate to work (for letsencrypt acme.sh client)

2020-08-05 Thread Brett Delmage
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Mark Andrews wrote: If I use the example zone on that page *no* errors are reported. If I modify restarchitect.com to have a A record at _acme-challenge.restarchitect.com then errors will be reported. I certainly did get an error originally. I would not have found this

Re: Algorithm compatibility between BIND 9.6.2 and 9.16

2020-08-05 Thread pvs
Yes Anand, hmac-md5 is supported. Thanks On 05-08-2020 15:47, pvs wrote: Let me check. Thanks Anand. On 05-08-2020 15:14, Anand Buddhdev wrote: On 05/08/2020 10:43, pvs wrote: Hello Vishnu, [snip] I would like to know the support of algorithm 'hmac-md5' in the new release of BIND 9.16

Re: Algorithm compatibility between BIND 9.6.2 and 9.16

2020-08-05 Thread pvs
Let me check. Thanks Anand. On 05-08-2020 15:14, Anand Buddhdev wrote: On 05/08/2020 10:43, pvs wrote: Hello Vishnu, [snip] I would like to know the support of algorithm 'hmac-md5' in the new release of BIND 9.16 for making the zone tranfer 'example.com' between the old master and new

Re: Algorithm compatibility between BIND 9.6.2 and 9.16

2020-08-05 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 05/08/2020 10:43, pvs wrote: Hello Vishnu, [snip] I would like to know the support of algorithm 'hmac-md5' in the new release of BIND 9.16 for making the zone tranfer 'example.com' between the old master and new slave. Hello Vishnu, I urge you to read the man page of "tsig-keygen". You

Algorithm compatibility between BIND 9.6.2 and 9.16

2020-08-05 Thread pvs
Hello, I am new to BIND installation and configuration. We have been using a set of BIND 9.6.2 servers (one is master & other one is slave) running on Fedora Core 10 with algorithm as 'hmac-md5'  for transferring zones and other DNS related data between Master-Slave. These BIND 9.6.2 server