Re: RFC7344 (was: Funky Key Tag in AWS Route53 (2))

2022-12-30 Thread bind--- via bind-users
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Peter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 03:43:35PM -0500, Timothe Litt wrote: > > ! So much like DNSSEC itself, the technology is there, but the will to use it > ! everywhere it's needed is not. > > Timothy, thank You for the update. I agree to Your

Re: RFC7344 (was: Funky Key Tag in AWS Route53 (2)) (2)

2022-12-30 Thread G.W. Haywood via bind-users
Hi there, On Fri, 30 Dec 2022, Timothe Litt wrote: The problem is politics, not technology. Well there might be a little more to it than that. People just don't know. When my wife asked about the security of her bank's Website they told her, "Don't worry, if there's a little padlock in

Re: RFC7344 (was: Funky Key Tag in AWS Route53 (2))

2022-12-30 Thread Peter
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 03:43:35PM -0500, Timothe Litt wrote: ! So much like DNSSEC itself, the technology is there, but the will to use it ! everywhere it's needed is not. Timothy, thank You for the update. I agree to Your viewpoints, and we have seen mostly the same with IPv6. Apparently it