Re: BIND 9.18 unable to successfully transfer zone from axfrdns primary

2023-08-31 Thread Michael Sinatra
Right, BIND 9.18 now enforces Section 2.2 of RFC 5936, specifically, this: "The AXFR server MUST copy the Question section from the corresponding AXFR query message into the first response message's Question section. For subsequent messages, it MAY do the same or leave the Question

Re: BIND 9.18 unable to successfully transfer zone from axfrdns primary

2023-08-31 Thread Ian Bobbitt
That gets me more information, and I think puts the problem onto axfrdns. Thanks. xfer-in: info: zone example.net/IN: Transfer started. xfer-in: debug 1: zone example.net/IN: forced reload, requesting AXFR of initial version from 198.51.100.1#53 xfer-in: info: transfer of 'example.net/IN' from

Re: BIND 9.18 unable to successfully transfer zone from axfrdns primary

2023-08-31 Thread Mark Andrews
Set debug level 3 on the xfrin channel. There are some debug level messages that really should be set to error level in lib/dns/xfrin.c on FORMERR. Also make sure you are running dig from the same version as later versions are more strict in parsing responses from the wire. > On 1 Sep 2023,

BIND 9.18 unable to successfully transfer zone from axfrdns primary

2023-08-31 Thread Ian Bobbitt
I have a system running BIND 9.18.17 that needs to transfer a zone from djbdns/axfrdns. I receive FORMERRs, and haven't been able to get any log messages indicating the problem. xfer-in: info: zone example.net/IN: Transfer started. xfer-in: info: transfer of 'example.net/IN' from

Re: Facing issues while resolving only one record

2023-08-31 Thread Mark Andrews
The servers don’t respond to DNSKEY queries. No every error is an indication that the validator should switch tracks from proving an answer is secure (the server is sending signed responses) to proving that it is insecure. > On 31 Aug 2023, at 17:28, stuart@registry.godaddy wrote: > > This is

Re: Facing issues while resolving only one record

2023-08-31 Thread stuart@registry.godaddy
This is odd. “incometax.gov.in” hasn’t published a DS record, so no DNSSEC validation should be occurring for any child. The registry object hasn’t been changed since 2022, so its behaviour should be nothing new. Testing various public verifying resolvers (google, cloudflare, local unbound