Not familiar with DSCP, Differentiated Services Code Point, a means of
classifying and managing network traffic and of providing quality of
service (QoS) in modern IP networks [D].
Google search found me a libuv conversation `Setting DSCP per UDP
datagram` [A] which links to `Extending the u
Hi Folks,
OK let me help you a bit as it’s really essential for DNS traffic which need to
be go through in all situations!!!
Within the OS networking stack as also within the network there is always a
prioritisation of packets within the queues to serialise the packets of an
application to go
On 28. 02. 24 13:50, Balazs Hinel (Nokia) via bind-users wrote:
I am working on a product in Nokia, and we currently use BIND provided by Rocky
Linux 8 with security patches. Recently the requirement came that we should
upgrade to at least 9.16. During the testing of this version we realized th
What I do not understand is, why is not matching always port 53 either
on source ports or destination ports as enough to set dscp marks. Unless
you need to differentiate dscp based on domain names, used views or
something similar, iptables rules should be able to set dscp very
similar way. With
How does that actually help with anything? The DNS traffic is not one way, but two way and unless everyone is setting DSCP on the DNS messages the incoming DNS messages will have same priority as incoming FTP traffic (to use your example).Ondrej--Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)My working hours and your
Hi Wolfgang.
Firstly let me say that I have never been a fan of QoS. So I'm slightly
biased against the whole thing in the first place.
But regarding your comment "It’s not easy for the network to guess the
requirements of an application," I would disagree. Traffic classification
and setting of DS
> On 29 Feb 2024, at 10:21, Petr Špaček wrote:
>
> On 28. 02. 24 13:50, Balazs Hinel (Nokia) via bind-users wrote:
>> I am working on a product in Nokia, and we currently use BIND provided by
>> Rocky Linux 8 with security patches. Recently the requirement came that we
>> should upgrade to at
Hi there,
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Wolfgang Riedel wrote:
In my case it?s dscp 24 in named.conf ...
If you don't set it, ...
ns9:~# >>> man named.conf | grep dscp
dscp ; // obsolete
--
73,
Ged.
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this
Hello,
> On 29 Feb 2024, at 09:34, Greg Choules via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> But regarding your comment "It’s not easy for the network to guess the
> requirements of an application," I would disagree. Traffic classification and
> setting of DSCP values is something that edge routers have been
Hi,
occasionally I get the following SERVFAIL error:
dig www.jiscd.sk
; <<>> DiG 9.18.24 <<>> www.jiscd.sk
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 12207
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTI
Hi Ludovit,
It looks like you have two version of the jiscd.sk zone.
host -C jiscd.sk
Nameserver 2001:67c:1bd4:8080::20:
jiscd.sk has SOA record ns1.gov.sk. gov.sk. 2024022501 7200 3600
604800 86400
Nameserver 195.49.191.160:
jiscd.sk has SOA record ns1.gov.sk. gov.sk. 2024022501 72
Hey,
BIND 9 supports a fixed rrset ordering (that is keeping the order of the RRSets
from the zone file). It has to be configured
at the compile time, it takes more memory (to record that order) and it's a
#ifdef all over the places.
So, henceforth, my question - does anyone still uses that? An
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:40 PM Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hey,
>
> BIND 9 supports a fixed rrset ordering (that is keeping the order of the
> RRSets from the zone file). It has to be configured
> at the compile time, it takes more memory (to record that order) and it's a
> #ifdef all over the places.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:38 AM Matt Nordhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:40 PM Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > BIND 9 supports a fixed rrset ordering (that is keeping the order of the
> > RRSets from the zone file). It has to be configured
> > at the compile time, it takes more memor
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:34:42AM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote:
> But bear in mind that this is only guaranteed to work inside your
> network/ASN. It’s not unusual to scrub DSCP at the network border.
Same problem would also apply to DSCP values set internally by named,
of course.
--
Evan Hunt --
> On 26. 2. 2024, at 22:41, Al Whaley wrote:
>
> A lot of pain and suffering in this world comes from people being sure they
> have a 'better idea' and everybody needs to do whatever. This feels a bit
> like that. A command that gives choice and real certainty would be great.
Hi,
I wanted t
Hello,
In line with ISC's deprecation policy, I am notifying the mailing list
of our intent to deprecate the "sortlist" options and a value "fixed"
for "rrset-order" option.
These options allow to specify a on order of the resource records
in the responses.
The "fixed" value for "rrset-order" op
17 matches
Mail list logo
