On Dec 9, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <b4fd91b6-c9da-47db-88bf-7f9af7883...@smtps.net>, Brian Keefer > write > s: >> Downloading the tarball for bind-9.7.2-P1 from ftp.isc.org and building it fr >> om source fixed the segfault issue. >> >> I'm still seeing a (possibly related) issue where if I do dig +trace txt <dns >> bl record> it takes 6-10 seconds (measured by time(1)) to complete, all after >> printing the authoritative server for DNSBL (prior to printing answer). >> >> If I do dig @<dnsbl.hostname> txt <dnsbl record> I get the same pause. If I d >> o dig @<dnsbl IP> txt <dnsbl record> there is no pause. There is also no pau >> se if I do dig <dnsbl.hostname>. It doesn't look like there's any issue reso >> lving the A RR, so why the long pause with dig +trace or dig @hostname vs. di >> g @IP? > > And if you look for IPv6 addresses? > > dig aaaa <dnsbl.hostname>
That's exactly it. I just figured that out by looking at the PCAP a minute before I read your e-mail. It's silently ignored. Mystery solved on the delay. -- bk _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
