On 2/21/14 3:39 AM, houguanghua houguang...@hotmail.com wrote:
kevin,
How does the local name server learn where is the 'stealth' slave? For the
'stealth' slave isn't in the NS records.
Also-notify directive. Either in an options stanza or a zone stanza.
thanks,
Guanghua
--
Daniel
On 7/23/13 7:36 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
In article mailman.881.1374508134.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
No, it does not. If a mail gets delivered to address, which is sending it
further (forwarding it), the envelope sender has to be changed,
On 7/2/13 8:42 AM, Sam Wilson sam.wil...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
There may be a subtle language thing going on here. I read the original
post above as saying, literally, you need PTR records because various
software tries to match A and PTR records. It doesn't say you need
PTR records because some
On 2/26/13 10:43 AM, Sten Carlsen st...@s-carlsen.dk wrote:
On 26/02/13 15:50, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I would expect that a namecaching server on the mailserver would reduce
traffic and resources all the way around.
I don't need my mailserver to constantly be asking my
On 2/14/13 1:46 PM, Mailinglists mailingli...@wso.net wrote:
I'm looking to migrate all of the zone data from one installation of Bind to
another...hardware move. One machine is very old but running a pretty modern
version of Bind 9.6-ESV-R8. The other server is running Bind 9.8.2 and is in
On 10/19/12 1:25 PM, John Miller johnm...@brandeis.edu wrote:
Hello everyone,
Perhaps a Cisco list is a better destination for this, but I've seen a
similar post here in the past couple of months, so posting here as well.
I'm trying to get our Cisco ACE set up appropriately to handle
On 5/7/12 8:29 AM, hugo hugoo hugo...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I have the following situation in my zone migration for one server (A) to
another server (B)
The zone is called toto.be and contains the following record:
www.toto.be 86400 IN CNAME www.titi.be
== the zone
On 5/7/12 11:32 AM, M. Meadows sun-g...@live.com wrote:
So ... if we have
exacttarget.com delegated to ns1 and ns2.exacttarget.com nameservers
and ... we manage the s6.exacttarget.com zone file from ns1 and
ns2.exacttarget.com
but we don't delegate s6 in the exacttarget.com
On 3/20/12 7:15 AM, trm asn trm.nag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Stefan Certic ste...@routotelecom.com
wrote:
Hi,
That can be achieved using iptables:
iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 53 -m state --state NEW -m nth
--counter 0 --every N
On 3/13/12 8:20 AM, hugo hugoo hugo...@hotmail.com wrote:
== do I have to create in zone toto.be the following NS record:
titi.toto.be. TTL IN NSns1.xxx.be
I have found cases where this situation is present and other when it is not
present...and both
On 8/31/11 10:13 PM, 风河 short...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I found that some queries have got the response which has additional
section, but some haven't.
For example, this query with www.google.com got the answer with
additional section set:
$ dig www.google.com
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 236
On 7/28/11 3:16 AM, uifid...@gmail.com uifid...@gmail.com wrote:
my czj.zone
$TTL 86400
czj. IN SOA localhost. root.localhost. (
1997022700 ; Serial
28800 ; Refresh
On 7/19/11 9:30 AM, almah...@ranksitt.net almah...@ranksitt.net wrote:
Hi,
If Bind version of primary dns is bind-libs-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 and for
secondary dns bind-9.5.0-29.b2.fc9.i386.
Is there create any problem??
In general, it creates no problem. If you happen to use an RR for which
On 7/11/11 12:15 PM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
Daniel McDonald dan.mcdon...@austinenergy.com wrote:
; DiG 9.8.0-P4 @localhost ips.backscatterer.local ds
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 26308
;; flags
I have a number of zones being served by rbldnsd, with bind as a front-end.
The zones are defined as forward only in named.conf.
When I enable dnssec validatation, these zones report that they are
insecure.
08-Jul-2011 08:55:58.700 dnssec: info: validating @0xb4260ad8:
ips.backscatterer.local
On 7/8/11 10:41 AM, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 08/07/11 15:13, Daniel McDonald wrote:
I have a number of zones being served by rbldnsd, with bind as a
front-end. The zones are defined as forward only in named.conf.
When I enable dnssec validatation, these zones report
I set up a zone with dnssec, and wanted to verify that it was working
properly. But I appear to have trouble with the root KSK.
$ dig +dnssec danmcdonald.us +topdown
;; No trusted key, +sigchase option is disabled
; DiG 9.7.3-P1 +dnssec danmcdonald.us +topdown
I appear to have the
On 6/7/11 7:51 AM, Barry Finkel bsfin...@anl.gov wrote:
There was a zone serial number mismatch, each zone expired three days
ago, and new zones were transferred from the master. But the zone
files on disk still have the higher serial numbers. There are no .jnl
files on the disk. A dig on
18 matches
Mail list logo
