Re: Bind9 stops responding for some clients

I just randomly spotted this post, and thought I would toss in 2¢ How many nics and how many it's are on the servers? Are the failing clients on the same subnet as the server? -- Gordon A. Lang On Thu, May 30, 2019, 8:10 PM Gregory Sloop wrote: > So, this is a very odd situation and I'm kind

Re: Fwd: problem using setuid ("-u" option) with BIND 9.10.3 on RedHat when listening on tun/tap interface

After reading Mark's post (found in my spam folder), I gather suid cannot be used with threads on Linux. So I have to choose between setting up a suid root wrapper, or simply not using threads. So my final question is whether or not using threads on Linux is sufficiently beneficial in spite of it

Fwd: problem using setuid ("-u" option) with BIND 9.10.3 on RedHat when listening on tun/tap interface

-- Forwarded message -- From: Gordon Lang Date: Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:29 PM Subject: Re: problem using setuid ("-u" option) with BIND 9.10.3 on RedHat when listening on tun/tap interface To: Carl Byington --disable-threads fixes the problem. But now the question is

Re: problem using setuid ("-u" option) with BIND 9.10.3 on RedHat when listening on tun/tap interface

nd-9.10.3/sbin chown root named chmod g-w named chmod u+s named On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Carl Byington wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 15:31 -0400, Gordon Lang wrote: > > > > It works fine with BIND 9.9.3 bu

Re: problem using setuid ("-u" option) with BIND 9.10.3 on RedHat when listening on tun/tap interface

It works fine with BIND 9.9.3 but not 9.10.3 on the same server. On Sep 27, 2015 3:25 PM, "Niall O'Reilly" wrote: > On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:59:14 +0100, > Gordon Lang wrote: > > > > Here is the file info: > > > > glang@nstv1:/export/local/ISC> ls

Re: problem using setuid ("-u" option) with BIND 9.10.3 on RedHat when listening on tun/tap interface

anges the owner of the process to 'incadmin'. -- Gordon A. Lang On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 17:27:56 +0100, > Gordon Lang wrote: > > > > CHANGE: I did not properly characterized the problem in my original >

Re: problem using setuid ("-u" option) with BIND 9.10.3 on RedHat when listening on tun/tap interface

but I can't use both at the same time. Can anyone shed any light on this scenario? Thanks. -- Gordon A. Lang On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Gordon Lang wrote: > Problem: named launches and functions perfectly fine if launched without > the "-u" option, but it won&#

problem using setuid ("-u" option) with BIND 9.10.3 on RedHat when listening on tun/tap interface

Problem: named launches and functions perfectly fine if launched without the "-u" option, but it won't listen on any ip addresses if any of them are bound to TAP interfaces when the "-u" is used. This problem surfaced when upgrading to BIND version 9.10.2-P3, but the problem does not occur with BI